Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)

2. No, "feminism" is beyond criticism in my opinion.

Reply to rrneck (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 6, 2013, 11:01 PM

Apr 2013

As long as you actually just stick to "feminism" as in the goal to seek equality for women.

What some do here under the banner of "feminism" is something entirely different. It is a form of rhetorical one-upmanship having more to do with striking out and earning points to satisfy some kind of emotional need than it does with actual rights.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I wonder what Lynn Margulis would have thought of the anti-science feminists. [View all] Bonobo Apr 2013 OP

Feminism can be a religion just like any other. nt rrneck Apr 2013 #1

No, "feminism" is beyond criticism in my opinion. Bonobo Apr 2013 #2

Gender is not binary MadrasT Apr 2013 #3

Symbiosis does not apply to members of the same species. MattBaggins Apr 2013 #4

You believe evolution plays no part in the way Bonobo Apr 2013 #6

Dimorphic characteristics are not gender roles MattBaggins Apr 2013 #7

The selection of partners based on behavior Bonobo Apr 2013 #8

The best part of humanity is our self awareness and adapt by using intelligence MattBaggins Apr 2013 #9

I agree that culture can mediate the behavior of gender roles. Bonobo Apr 2013 #10

I didn't back off anything MattBaggins Apr 2013 #11

Sure, whatever. Bonobo Apr 2013 #12

Interesting that you would wonder what Margulis would think of anti science? MattBaggins Apr 2013 #5