Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Men are capable of better [View all]Gore1FL
(22,129 posts)70. That's not the issue
I am not sure that a sliver-of-truth wrapped fallacy and served in a flamebait gravy over a bed of unspecificity really requires or deserves a focus on the sliver-of-truth part of it. It's not our job to sift through a pile of feces to find what might be edible.
If I posted a graphic that read:
"2+2=4
Jews are bad for themselves.
Christians know what's better for Jews."
and I provided no further commentary, in the original post, and only followed it up with platitudes, would you take the time to defend the 2+2=4 part and express disbelief that no one could "manage to agree that there just might be some truth in that"?
The purpose of the graphic was not to provide deep introspection, but to be divisive.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
I'm glad to see Kevin Spacey getting back to playing dark and immoral.
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#15
OK: You take a hit and I say "The thing is, it's Floozflatz that gives you the bunions on your feet!
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#62
Does "Patriarchy" have a radio station? Is there a mailing address for "Feminism"?
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#3
You're obviously some knuckle dragging troglodyte who needs to be dragged into the 21st century
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#60
"don't think there is a concerted war on women".... Did someone actually say that?
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#57
So you've enlisted in the fight by lobbing a grenade into the men's group...
Major Nikon
May 2013
#63
There are a whole host of implied assumptions behind the OP and the thread.
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#61
the responses to the op are a sorry mess of denial and defensive poutrage.
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#66
Actually many of the regulars here have written lengthy posts on what you think we can't agree on
Major Nikon
May 2013
#69
You have to explain the op by putting in stuff that isn't there- isn't that a red flag?
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#74
Definitions; Ideally they should have some relationship to the thing they're referring to.
lumberjack_jeff
May 2013
#44
A good place to start would be defining our terms and being transparent about our motives.
Warren DeMontague
May 2013
#58
I understand what you're saying. But I also understand some of the responses.
nomorenomore08
May 2013
#80