Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Oil Train Safety Megathread. Updated July 30, 2023 [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(60,963 posts)19. Keystone boosters turfed from office in bitumen’s homeland
Keystone boosters turfed from office in bitumens homeland
Wednesday, May 06, 2015
Written by David Thomas, Contributing Editor
Prospects for the contentious Keystone XL pipeline proposed to connect Albertas northern tar sands with U.S. Gulf Coast refiners has endured another brutal body check, this time from the home team. The provinces brand-new, left-leaning government elected May 5 says it will cease its predecessors long campaign of supplicating and bullying President Barack Obama for the pipelines approval. ... Cross-border transportation of much Alberta bitumen may thus default to railon condition that producers figure out how to ship the stuff without the highly volatile naptha and hydrogen components artificially added to make the goop flow and to juice up its energy content.
....
Before last winters twin oil train disasters in northern Ontario, conventional wisdom was that old DOT-111s could be reassigned to Alberta bitumen service as they were phased out for more volatile crudes, particularly Baaken. The CN derailments and chain reaction explosions revealed that bitumen is no longer benign, barely flammable tar once it has been diluted with highly explosive naptha or synthetically charged with hydrogen.
If CBR is to continue as a conduit for Albertas modified bitumen, shippers will have to find a way to reduce its volatility. U.S. regulators are making clear that new tank cars and operating rules are just the first step in de-weaponizing the shipment of crude by rail. It now seems clear that new rules are on the way to require removal of explosive gases before loading into railcars, instead of adding them as bitumen shippers do now. ... The only visible option is to heat raw bitumen so that it will flow into and out of tank cars. That requires special tank cars with internal steam coils that re-melt the bitumen at its destination. Such steam-coiled cars are rare and none conform to the new DOT-117 specification. In fact, the new tank car specs do not even consider steam coils as an option.
Thus, Albertas dumping of Keystone XL as an objective of public policy creates a long-term opportunity for CBR, but only if tar sands bitumen can be carried across international boundaries in a state acceptable to regulators and politicians.
Written by David Thomas, Contributing Editor
Prospects for the contentious Keystone XL pipeline proposed to connect Albertas northern tar sands with U.S. Gulf Coast refiners has endured another brutal body check, this time from the home team. The provinces brand-new, left-leaning government elected May 5 says it will cease its predecessors long campaign of supplicating and bullying President Barack Obama for the pipelines approval. ... Cross-border transportation of much Alberta bitumen may thus default to railon condition that producers figure out how to ship the stuff without the highly volatile naptha and hydrogen components artificially added to make the goop flow and to juice up its energy content.
....
Before last winters twin oil train disasters in northern Ontario, conventional wisdom was that old DOT-111s could be reassigned to Alberta bitumen service as they were phased out for more volatile crudes, particularly Baaken. The CN derailments and chain reaction explosions revealed that bitumen is no longer benign, barely flammable tar once it has been diluted with highly explosive naptha or synthetically charged with hydrogen.
If CBR is to continue as a conduit for Albertas modified bitumen, shippers will have to find a way to reduce its volatility. U.S. regulators are making clear that new tank cars and operating rules are just the first step in de-weaponizing the shipment of crude by rail. It now seems clear that new rules are on the way to require removal of explosive gases before loading into railcars, instead of adding them as bitumen shippers do now. ... The only visible option is to heat raw bitumen so that it will flow into and out of tank cars. That requires special tank cars with internal steam coils that re-melt the bitumen at its destination. Such steam-coiled cars are rare and none conform to the new DOT-117 specification. In fact, the new tank car specs do not even consider steam coils as an option.
Thus, Albertas dumping of Keystone XL as an objective of public policy creates a long-term opportunity for CBR, but only if tar sands bitumen can be carried across international boundaries in a state acceptable to regulators and politicians.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The stuff was getting scattered. I was impressed by progree's analysis
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2015
#2
One year after Lynchburg train wreck, booming Bakken still fuels concerns
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2015
#12
EIA: Rail delivered 52 percent of East Coast refinery supply in February
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2015
#14
FRA freezes on tank car sloshing; DOE oil volatility bombshell drops like a dud
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2015
#20
Vancouver (Washington) Columbian Three-Part Series About Port Oil Terminal Deal
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2015
#22
UW-Madison researchers hope frac-sand impact study will help railroads improve ballast maintenance
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2015
#26
Canadian Pacific asks judge not to approve Lac-Megantic derailment settlement
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2015
#29
FRA Announces Final Rule to Prevent Unattended Trains from Rolling Away
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2015
#32
Federal Railroad Administration to RRs: Notification of Crude Oil Trains to States Must Continue
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2015
#33
Officials: Broken rail missed on 2 inspections caused fiery West Va. train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2015
#34
Federal Railroad Administration Issues Final Rule to Improve Rail Flaw Detection {January 2014}
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2015
#36
Washington state transportation commission adopts crude-by-rail safety rules
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2016
#45
NTSB report: Broken rail likely caused 2014 Lynchburg train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2016
#46
Minnesota legislators want railroads to open books on emergency response
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2016
#47
Oil-by-rail safety concerns likely to reignite after Oregon derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2016
#49
2 ND rail inspectors receive certification from the Federal Railroad Administration
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2016
#51
NTSB releases dashcam videos of December 30, 2013, Casselton, North Dakota, oil train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2017
#52
Wilmington News Journal - Delaware Online: Rail safety questioned as fuel shipments likely to go up
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2017
#53
National Academy Study Touts Oil-by-Rail Safety But Supports Weakening Regulations
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2017
#55
Tar Sands Crude Shipments Quietly Increased In Oregon, With Regulators In the Dark
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2019
#66
Hazardous Materials: Washington Crude Oil By Rail-Vapor Pressure Requirements
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2019
#67
BNSF says it can handle more crude-by-rail shipments if Dakota pipeline is shut
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2021
#70
Moffat Tunnel lease could become part of fight over Uinta Basin Railway
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2023
#74
6 months after the East Palestine train derailment, Congress is deadlocked on new rules for safety
BumRushDaShow
Aug 2023
#76