Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: WEE December 4, 2015 I'll start......I'll start with some...... [View all]Proserpina
(2,352 posts)51. Don't bet on it: These 2015 predictions were way off base
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/12/06/predictions-for-2015-that-were-way-off-base.html
It's that time of year again, when everyone starts pushing out their predictions for next year. (And yes, that includes this organization.) Some 2016 predictions are already out, such as those at Fortune and Macworld.
But let's face it: Most of those predictions end up being wrong. We can be safe in taking them with a (giant) grain of salt or perhaps discounting them altogether.
For reference, here's a sampling of predictions put out last December, trying to forecast what would happen this year.
Fortune said the S&P 500 would close the year at 2312, but we can safely say that's not going to happen (The index closed Friday just below 2100). It also predicted "mom jeans get hot" (needless to say they didn't) and "football helmets get a lot more futuristic."
Then there are vague predictions, that you can't exactly measure or give a precise result for. The Atlantic offered "4 expert predictions for the global economy in 2015", yet each prediction was a story at least five paragraphs long. One of the predictions said the US faces a debt "reckoning" but that didn't really happen, did it?
well, not yet... more
It's that time of year again, when everyone starts pushing out their predictions for next year. (And yes, that includes this organization.) Some 2016 predictions are already out, such as those at Fortune and Macworld.
But let's face it: Most of those predictions end up being wrong. We can be safe in taking them with a (giant) grain of salt or perhaps discounting them altogether.
For reference, here's a sampling of predictions put out last December, trying to forecast what would happen this year.
Fortune said the S&P 500 would close the year at 2312, but we can safely say that's not going to happen (The index closed Friday just below 2100). It also predicted "mom jeans get hot" (needless to say they didn't) and "football helmets get a lot more futuristic."
Then there are vague predictions, that you can't exactly measure or give a precise result for. The Atlantic offered "4 expert predictions for the global economy in 2015", yet each prediction was a story at least five paragraphs long. One of the predictions said the US faces a debt "reckoning" but that didn't really happen, did it?
well, not yet... more
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I can't believe she got a time out for posting a legitimate article from a legitimate source.
mother earth
Dec 2015
#19
Unlike mainstream prognosticators, who seem to always find a silver lining. Or 100...
MattSh
Dec 2015
#7
Closing the 'Collapse Gap': the USSR was better prepared for collapse than the US
MattSh
Dec 2015
#9
The Countries With The Highest Levels Of Poverty For Retirees [Infographic] - Forbes
MattSh
Dec 2015
#11
The Federal Reserve Board's 8 Percent Hike in the Social Security Tax / Dean Baker
Proserpina
Dec 2015
#38