Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,963 posts)
60. PHMSA pulls ECP brake requirement
Tue Sep 25, 2018, 02:02 PM
Sep 2018
Rail News Home Federal Legislation & Regulation 9/25/2018

Rail News: Federal Legislation & Regulation

PHMSA pulls ECP brake requirement

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) yesterday rescinded a mandate that would have required crude-oil trains to use electronically controlled pneumatic (ECP) braking systems. ... The PHMSA took the action after it conducted a congressionally mandated review of the regulation's impact, and determined that the expected costs of requiring ECP brakes would be "significantly higher" than the expected benefits, according to a PHMSA press release. ... Rescinding the mandate does not affect the ability of railroads to use ECP brakes, PHMSA officials said.

ECP brakes issue electronic signals to simultaneously apply and release brakes throughout the length of a train instead of each car applying brakes individually — a system some consider more effective in emergency situations.

The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act required further analysis of the ECP brake requirements, including physical testing, to see how much more effective ECP brakes are in comparison to other brake systems. ... The FAST Act also required the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) to determine whether the ECP brake requirements were justified based on costs and benefits. The updated analysis — which incorporated new findings from the Federal Railroad Administration's (FRA) testing of ECP braking systems — determined that costs outweighed the benefits based on current economic conditions.

Efforts to repeal the implementation of ECP braking systems have been underway since the Trump administration took office in January 2017. In December 2017, the USDOT repealed a May 2015 FRA rulemaking that would have required the installation of ECP braking systems. ... In October 2016, the U.S. Government Accountability Office recommended that the USDOT acknowledge uncertainty in its revised economic analysis of ECP brakes, and collect data on railroads' use of the systems. Industry stakeholders — such as the Association of American Railroads — had claimed that the USDOT initially overestimated the benefits.

PHMSA Rescinds ECP Brake Mandate After RIA Finds Costs Outweigh Benefits

Monday, September 24, 2018
The U.S. Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) today finalized amendments to the Hazardous Materials Regulations which remove the requirement, while still allowing, for certain High Hazard Flammable Unit Trains (HHFUT) to operate using electronically controlled pneumatic (ECP) braking systems. The Department's action is based on a Congressional requirement to conduct an updated Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). The Department's analysis shows that the expected costs of requiring ECP brakes would be significantly higher than the expected benefits of the requirement. This regulatory change does not affect the ability of a railroad to implement ECP brakes.

The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act required further analysis of the ECP brake requirements, including physical testing, to improve general knowledge and understanding of how much more effective ECP brakes are in comparison to other brake systems. It also required DOT to determine whether the ECP brake requirements are justified based on the expected costs and benefits. The updated RIA incorporated new findings from ECP brake testing conducted by the Federal Railroad Administration, which were reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences. The updated RIA also incorporated recommendations from U.S. Government Accountability Office, and updated costs and benefits of the ECP brake provision based on current economic conditions. The updated RIA found that the expected costs of ECP brakes are significantly higher than the expected benefits, and therefore the FAST Act required DOT to repeal the ECP brake requirement.

For more details, the Department's Final Rule announcing its decision, along with the final updated RIA that responds to comments received, are available for review at http://www.regulations.gov in Docket Number PHMSA-2017-0102.

Updated: Monday, September 24, 2018
Thanks for keeping us up to date on these important matters. elleng Mar 2015 #1
The stuff was getting scattered. I was impressed by progree's analysis mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2015 #2
Yes, that's very impressive. elleng Mar 2015 #3
Links, Late 2014 - April 30, 2015 mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #11
Oil Trains at Junction in North Dakota mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2015 #35
Fewer Oil Trains Ply America’s Rails mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #6
NTSB Calls for Aggressive Schedule to Fix Railcar Fleet mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #8
Regulators Urge Railroads to Make Changes to Improve Oil-Train Safety mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #9
Oil prices, safety concerns slow crude-by-rail trains mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #10
One year after Lynchburg train wreck, booming Bakken still fuels concerns mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #12
Links, May 1 - July 31, 2015 mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2015 #40
EIA: Rail delivered 52 percent of East Coast refinery supply in February mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #14
Thanks for keeping track of these derailments, n/t DemReadingDU May 2015 #15
De nada, but note that mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #17
Lots of valuable information DemReadingDU May 2015 #18
The war over electric brakes mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #16
Keystone boosters turfed from office in bitumen’s homeland mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #19
FRA freezes on tank car sloshing; DOE oil volatility bombshell drops like a dud mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #20
Oil Industry Asks Court to Block Rail Transport Safety Rules mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #21
Vancouver (Washington) Columbian Three-Part Series About Port Oil Terminal Deal mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #22
Customer concerns prompt BNSF to withdraw plan to buy tank cars mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #23
AAR says oil-by-rail volumes dropped almost 12% in first quarter mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #24
Tesoro building crude railcars stronger than new US rules require mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #25
UW-Madison researchers hope frac-sand impact study will help railroads improve ballast maintenance mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2015 #26
Wyoming: Lawmakers studying safety of trains carrying oil mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2015 #27
Full NJ Senate to vote on rules for oil trains mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2015 #28
Canadian Pacific asks judge not to approve Lac-Megantic derailment settlement mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2015 #29
Latest tank car, rail inspections in New York turn up 62 defects mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2015 #30
BNSF seeks to speed up to 60 mph through Miles City, Montana mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2015 #31
FRA Announces Final Rule to Prevent Unattended Trains from Rolling Away mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2015 #32
Federal Railroad Administration to RRs: Notification of Crude Oil Trains to States Must Continue mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2015 #33
Officials: Broken rail missed on 2 inspections caused fiery West Va. train derailment mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2015 #34
Federal Railroad Administration Issues Final Rule to Improve Rail Flaw Detection {January 2014} mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2015 #36
Report questions safety of rusting, crumbling railroad bridges mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2015 #37
Oil train safety concerns cast shadow over cross-border rail deal mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2015 #38
Oil trains raise alarm for Denver residents in growing neighborhoods mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2015 #39
First responders often unprepared for derailments mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2015 #41
Still no final report 2 years after fiery Casselton oil crash mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2015 #42
Crude by rail down, but officials still bracing for danger on tracks mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2016 #43
Maine rail cargo secrecy law bypassed public access, safety defenses mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2016 #44
Washington state transportation commission adopts crude-by-rail safety rules mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2016 #45
NTSB report: Broken rail likely caused 2014 Lynchburg train derailment mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2016 #46
Minnesota legislators want railroads to open books on emergency response mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2016 #47
Little progress on rail safety in wake of Lac Mégantic mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2016 #48
Oil-by-rail safety concerns likely to reignite after Oregon derailment mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2016 #49
New Directive Targets Crude-by-Rail Safety mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2016 #50
2 ND rail inspectors receive certification from the Federal Railroad Administration mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2016 #51
NTSB releases dashcam videos of December 30, 2013, Casselton, North Dakota, oil train derailment mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2017 #52
Wilmington News Journal - Delaware Online: Rail safety questioned as fuel shipments likely to go up mahatmakanejeeves May 2017 #53
North Dakota may halt rail inspections aimed at derailments mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2017 #54
National Academy Study Touts Oil-by-Rail Safety But Supports Weakening Regulations mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2017 #55
Trumpy don't care Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2018 #56
Canada Transport Ministry Fast-Tracks Crude Oil Rail Car Phase-Out mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2018 #57
Trump officials roll back Obama oil train safety rule mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2018 #58
North Dakota Regulators Mull Relaxing Oil Train Shipment Rules mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2018 #59
PHMSA pulls ECP brake requirement mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2018 #60
U.S. issues new rules requiring rail oil spill response plans Eugene Feb 2019 #61
Thanks. Here's more, from the NTSB: mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2019 #62
Thanks for doing this for all these years. nt Hotler Feb 2019 #63
Oil Trains Make Comeback as Pipeline Bottlenecks Worsen mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 #64
NEB cites options for addressing tight oil-moving capacity in Canada mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 #65
Tar Sands Crude Shipments Quietly Increased In Oregon, With Regulators In the Dark mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2019 #66
Hazardous Materials: Washington Crude Oil By Rail-Vapor Pressure Requirements mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2019 #67
Is crude by rail doomed? mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2020 #68
Court ruling may make it harder to cut train crew sizes to 1 mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2021 #69
BNSF says it can handle more crude-by-rail shipments if Dakota pipeline is shut mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2021 #70
Railroad venture boosts number of oil trains in Minnesota mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2021 #71
I applaud you MsLeopard Oct 2021 #72
Bump up DemReadingDU Jan 2022 #73
Moffat Tunnel lease could become part of fight over Uinta Basin Railway mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2023 #74
Post removed Post removed Aug 2023 #75
6 months after the East Palestine train derailment, Congress is deadlocked on new rules for safety BumRushDaShow Aug 2023 #76
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Oil Train Safety Megathre...»Reply #60