Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,962 posts)
67. Hazardous Materials: Washington Crude Oil By Rail-Vapor Pressure Requirements
Wed Aug 14, 2019, 12:02 PM
Aug 2019
Hazardous Materials: Washington Crude Oil By Rail-Vapor Pressure Requirements
....

Supplementary Information

I. Application for a Preemption Determination

The State of North Dakota and the State of Montana have applied to PHMSA for a determination whether Federal hazardous material transportation law (HMTA), 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq., preempts the State of Washington's Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5579, Crude Oil By Rail—Vapor Pressure. Specifically, North Dakota and Montana allege the law, which purports to regulate the volatility of crude oil transported in Washington state for loading and unloading, amounts to a de facto ban on Bakken  (1) crude.

North Dakota and Montana present two main arguments for why they believe Washington's law should be preempted. First, North Dakota and Montana contend that the law's prohibition on the loading or unloading of crude oil with more than 9 psi vapor pressure poses obstacles to the HMTA because compliance with the law can only be accomplished by (1) pretreating the crude oil prior to loading the tank car; (2) selecting an alternate mode of transportation; or (3) redirecting the crude oil to facilities outside Washington state. Accordingly, North Dakota and Montana say these avenues for complying with the law impose obstacles to accomplishing the purposes of the HMTA. Similarly, they contend that the law's pre-notification requirements are an obstacle. Last, North Dakota and Montana contend that Washington's law is preempted because aspects of the law are not substantively the same as the federal requirements for the classification and handling of this type of hazardous material.

In summary, North Dakota and Montana contend the State of Washington's Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5579, Crude Oil By Rail—Vapor Pressure, should be preempted because:

It is an obstacle to the federal hazardous material transportation legal and regulatory regime; and
It is not substantively the same as the federal regulations governing the classification and handling of crude oil in transportation.
....
Thanks for keeping us up to date on these important matters. elleng Mar 2015 #1
The stuff was getting scattered. I was impressed by progree's analysis mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2015 #2
Yes, that's very impressive. elleng Mar 2015 #3
Links, Late 2014 - April 30, 2015 mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #11
Oil Trains at Junction in North Dakota mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2015 #35
Fewer Oil Trains Ply America’s Rails mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #6
NTSB Calls for Aggressive Schedule to Fix Railcar Fleet mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #8
Regulators Urge Railroads to Make Changes to Improve Oil-Train Safety mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #9
Oil prices, safety concerns slow crude-by-rail trains mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #10
One year after Lynchburg train wreck, booming Bakken still fuels concerns mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2015 #12
Links, May 1 - July 31, 2015 mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2015 #40
EIA: Rail delivered 52 percent of East Coast refinery supply in February mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #14
Thanks for keeping track of these derailments, n/t DemReadingDU May 2015 #15
De nada, but note that mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #17
Lots of valuable information DemReadingDU May 2015 #18
The war over electric brakes mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #16
Keystone boosters turfed from office in bitumen’s homeland mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #19
FRA freezes on tank car sloshing; DOE oil volatility bombshell drops like a dud mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #20
Oil Industry Asks Court to Block Rail Transport Safety Rules mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #21
Vancouver (Washington) Columbian Three-Part Series About Port Oil Terminal Deal mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #22
Customer concerns prompt BNSF to withdraw plan to buy tank cars mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #23
AAR says oil-by-rail volumes dropped almost 12% in first quarter mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #24
Tesoro building crude railcars stronger than new US rules require mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #25
UW-Madison researchers hope frac-sand impact study will help railroads improve ballast maintenance mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2015 #26
Wyoming: Lawmakers studying safety of trains carrying oil mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2015 #27
Full NJ Senate to vote on rules for oil trains mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2015 #28
Canadian Pacific asks judge not to approve Lac-Megantic derailment settlement mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2015 #29
Latest tank car, rail inspections in New York turn up 62 defects mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2015 #30
BNSF seeks to speed up to 60 mph through Miles City, Montana mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2015 #31
FRA Announces Final Rule to Prevent Unattended Trains from Rolling Away mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2015 #32
Federal Railroad Administration to RRs: Notification of Crude Oil Trains to States Must Continue mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2015 #33
Officials: Broken rail missed on 2 inspections caused fiery West Va. train derailment mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2015 #34
Federal Railroad Administration Issues Final Rule to Improve Rail Flaw Detection {January 2014} mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2015 #36
Report questions safety of rusting, crumbling railroad bridges mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2015 #37
Oil train safety concerns cast shadow over cross-border rail deal mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2015 #38
Oil trains raise alarm for Denver residents in growing neighborhoods mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2015 #39
First responders often unprepared for derailments mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2015 #41
Still no final report 2 years after fiery Casselton oil crash mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2015 #42
Crude by rail down, but officials still bracing for danger on tracks mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2016 #43
Maine rail cargo secrecy law bypassed public access, safety defenses mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2016 #44
Washington state transportation commission adopts crude-by-rail safety rules mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2016 #45
NTSB report: Broken rail likely caused 2014 Lynchburg train derailment mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2016 #46
Minnesota legislators want railroads to open books on emergency response mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2016 #47
Little progress on rail safety in wake of Lac Mégantic mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2016 #48
Oil-by-rail safety concerns likely to reignite after Oregon derailment mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2016 #49
New Directive Targets Crude-by-Rail Safety mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2016 #50
2 ND rail inspectors receive certification from the Federal Railroad Administration mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2016 #51
NTSB releases dashcam videos of December 30, 2013, Casselton, North Dakota, oil train derailment mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2017 #52
Wilmington News Journal - Delaware Online: Rail safety questioned as fuel shipments likely to go up mahatmakanejeeves May 2017 #53
North Dakota may halt rail inspections aimed at derailments mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2017 #54
National Academy Study Touts Oil-by-Rail Safety But Supports Weakening Regulations mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2017 #55
Trumpy don't care Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2018 #56
Canada Transport Ministry Fast-Tracks Crude Oil Rail Car Phase-Out mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2018 #57
Trump officials roll back Obama oil train safety rule mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2018 #58
North Dakota Regulators Mull Relaxing Oil Train Shipment Rules mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2018 #59
PHMSA pulls ECP brake requirement mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2018 #60
U.S. issues new rules requiring rail oil spill response plans Eugene Feb 2019 #61
Thanks. Here's more, from the NTSB: mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2019 #62
Thanks for doing this for all these years. nt Hotler Feb 2019 #63
Oil Trains Make Comeback as Pipeline Bottlenecks Worsen mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 #64
NEB cites options for addressing tight oil-moving capacity in Canada mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 #65
Tar Sands Crude Shipments Quietly Increased In Oregon, With Regulators In the Dark mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2019 #66
Hazardous Materials: Washington Crude Oil By Rail-Vapor Pressure Requirements mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2019 #67
Is crude by rail doomed? mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2020 #68
Court ruling may make it harder to cut train crew sizes to 1 mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2021 #69
BNSF says it can handle more crude-by-rail shipments if Dakota pipeline is shut mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2021 #70
Railroad venture boosts number of oil trains in Minnesota mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2021 #71
I applaud you MsLeopard Oct 2021 #72
Bump up DemReadingDU Jan 2022 #73
Moffat Tunnel lease could become part of fight over Uinta Basin Railway mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2023 #74
Post removed Post removed Aug 2023 #75
6 months after the East Palestine train derailment, Congress is deadlocked on new rules for safety BumRushDaShow Aug 2023 #76
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Oil Train Safety Megathre...»Reply #67