Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(53,688 posts)
46. Are you saying "the mob" caused the destruction to the cement trucks?
Sun Jun 4, 2023, 01:25 PM
Jun 2023

Come on, the union movement did not get in bed with the mob, that is a right wing talking point. The union movement took "a wrong turn" when it gave up after Reagan broke the PATCO strike.

Like the chickens voting for multigraincracker Jun 2023 #1
Exactly Multigraincracker. Duncanpup Jun 2023 #2
thing is, 8-1, it wasn't just the Repuke votes on the court. 3Hotdogs Jun 2023 #3
see my reply below. mopinko Jun 2023 #5
i read the about ruling and it's a bit complicated. mopinko Jun 2023 #4
This encourages malicious suits by companies against unions. SunSeeker Jun 2023 #10
well, it is a bit fuzzy. mopinko Jun 2023 #17
Are you saying "the mob" caused the destruction to the cement trucks? SunSeeker Jun 2023 #46
no. i'm saying violence and breaking shit is not good for the union movement. mopinko Jun 2023 #55
This isn't the 1970s. Unions, what's left of them, are pretty by the book now. SunSeeker Jun 2023 #59
because a lower court had ruled that stopdiggin Jun 2023 #43
Deliberate destruction is already illegal. Why was this ruling necessary? nt SunSeeker Jun 2023 #45
because a lower court stopdiggin Jun 2023 #57
Just like Citizens United there was not advance news reports in advance. Delmette2.0 Jun 2023 #6
good point about this being on radar. A hush docket. Evolve Dammit Jun 2023 #22
Amen to that Joinfortmill Jun 2023 #7
I was complaining about this the other day in a thread. Bluethroughu Jun 2023 #8
Exactly. Justice Brown-Jackson was the only one who saw reality. SunSeeker Jun 2023 #11
I think like most people not knowledgeable in construction, Bluethroughu Jun 2023 #14
do we know that? mopinko Jun 2023 #18
The Union is not going to sabotage equipment they are going to need to make a pay check Bluethroughu Jun 2023 #24
according to the ruling, they had to construct bunkers to take the load. mopinko Jun 2023 #37
They sell and use those bunkers, and when they dump hot loads Bluethroughu Jun 2023 #38
Exactly. This basically allows SLAPP suits against unions. SunSeeker Jun 2023 #48
...pleased that today's decision... doesn't change labor law and leaves the right to strike intact. MayReasonRule Jun 2023 #40
SEIU needs to get a backbone. Telling us "it could have been worse" is pitiful. SunSeeker Jun 2023 #51
Might That Be An Outlier? Or Is It Part And Parcel Of Their Pattern And Practice? MayReasonRule Jun 2023 #56
I agree. nt SunSeeker Jun 2023 #47
She is the voice of reason on this Court mountain grammy Jun 2023 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Joinfortmill Jun 2023 #9
People just don't get how the "middle class" doesn't exist without collective bargaining. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #12
This exactly! Bluethroughu Jun 2023 #15
I worked in union shops for 35 years. I am a solid liberal Democratic voter The Jungle 1 Jun 2023 #13
The management team had plenty of time to unload the trucks. Bluethroughu Jun 2023 #16
Site management did unload the trucks. The Jungle 1 Jun 2023 #19
Piss on Coathanger Barrett; she's dead wrong, as is this ruling. Hermit-The-Prog Jun 2023 #34
Labor Leaders Are Relieved This Doesn't Change Labor Law And Leaves The Right To Strike Intact MayReasonRule Jun 2023 #41
They didn't abandon fully loaded trucks without telling anyone. Glacier knew they were on strike. SunSeeker Jun 2023 #49
This is a complicated issue and we won part of it. The Jungle 1 Jun 2023 #28
imho, the union movement lost a lot of steam mopinko Jun 2023 #39
You're On Point. Thank You For Your Voice Of Reason! MayReasonRule Jun 2023 #42
Here's the actual ruling OnlinePoker Jun 2023 #20
thanks. that's helpful. mopinko Jun 2023 #31
This isn't about the strike, it's about the vandalism localroger Jun 2023 #21
I should have seen your reply first. I pointed out the same thing. Pacifist Patriot Jun 2023 #27
The acceptance of unions lies in management's respect for its power. jaxexpat Jun 2023 #32
Vandalism is already illegal. Why did Glacier need this ruling? nt SunSeeker Jun 2023 #50
My granddaughters range from 16 to 22 mountain grammy Jun 2023 #23
I'm on the side of the Union! Bluethroughu Jun 2023 #30
I'm CWA retired and proud Deuxcents Jun 2023 #54
Important distinction needs to be made though. The ruling was not about suing employees FOR striking Pacifist Patriot Jun 2023 #26
if they'd announced the strike, they'd have been fine. mopinko Jun 2023 #35
You do not know these people. Please stop defaming these workers. SunSeeker Jun 2023 #53
The company knew the union was going to strike, they Bluethroughu Jun 2023 #36
questioning this stopdiggin Jun 2023 #44
SCOTUS should not be making a ruling based on disputed facts. SunSeeker Jun 2023 #52
disputed on THIS site stopdiggin Jun 2023 #58
do u know how much 16 truck of concrete cost? mopinko Jun 2023 #60
yep. this was a big ol' giant FU stopdiggin Jun 2023 #61
Jesus H 3auld6phart Jun 2023 #29
And they use Christian dogma as science Farmer-Rick Jun 2023 #33
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»Anyone notice the supreme...»Reply #46