Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Omaha Steve's Labor Group
In reply to the discussion: Anyone notice the supremes ruling 8-1 yesterday on companies can sue striking workers. [View all]mopinko
(71,802 posts)55. no. i'm saying violence and breaking shit is not good for the union movement.
and no, it isnt a talking point. i was in the biz in chi, in the late 70s. before raygun. this is shit i heard from ppl i knew. we went on strike. i was young, and i had older guys take me aside, and let me know what would happen if i crossed, tho they hoped i wouldnt get my then pretty face messed w.
heard plenty of tales from chitown old 1s, which, even w the large grain of salt i took them w, did not endear the brotherhood to me. btn the old stories, and the way i and other women were treated, how my black brothers were treated, i got a different perspective on the union. loved my job, my pay, my bennies, and didnt even mind paying my dues.
but the thugs i saw, even back then, turned my stomach.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Anyone notice the supremes ruling 8-1 yesterday on companies can sue striking workers. [View all]
Duncanpup
Jun 2023
OP
This isn't the 1970s. Unions, what's left of them, are pretty by the book now.
SunSeeker
Jun 2023
#59
The Union is not going to sabotage equipment they are going to need to make a pay check
Bluethroughu
Jun 2023
#24
...pleased that today's decision... doesn't change labor law and leaves the right to strike intact.
MayReasonRule
Jun 2023
#40
SEIU needs to get a backbone. Telling us "it could have been worse" is pitiful.
SunSeeker
Jun 2023
#51
Might That Be An Outlier? Or Is It Part And Parcel Of Their Pattern And Practice?
MayReasonRule
Jun 2023
#56
People just don't get how the "middle class" doesn't exist without collective bargaining.
jaxexpat
Jun 2023
#12
I worked in union shops for 35 years. I am a solid liberal Democratic voter
The Jungle 1
Jun 2023
#13
Labor Leaders Are Relieved This Doesn't Change Labor Law And Leaves The Right To Strike Intact
MayReasonRule
Jun 2023
#41
They didn't abandon fully loaded trucks without telling anyone. Glacier knew they were on strike.
SunSeeker
Jun 2023
#49
Important distinction needs to be made though. The ruling was not about suing employees FOR striking
Pacifist Patriot
Jun 2023
#26