Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Education

(14,408 posts)

6. "did not mention which textbooks had been rejected or cite examples from the offending passages"

Mon Apr 18, 2022, 03:40 PM

Apr 2022

I can hardly wait. This story has been out for a few days and so far there seems to be no effort to explain "offending passages" from the FDOE.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Florida rejects math books with 'references' to critical race theory [View all] Eugene Apr 2022 OP

Nobody has math texts anymore arlyellowdog Apr 2022 #1

Test Question from Florida's New approved Math book. Chainfire Apr 2022 #2

"Don't wanna see no ******s, *****s, or ****s in our kid's textbooks." Girard442 Apr 2022 #3

How very Warsaw Pact of them. nt eppur_se_muova Apr 2022 #4

It is tempting to say I would ban a book that has the word twodogsbarking Apr 2022 #5

For this thread LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2022 #7