Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
27. Bad, bad, bad idea
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 03:05 PM
Jan 2013

Many high school aged kids need to work in the summer. Or maybe they just want to work, which can be a good life experience, even if it is just to save up money for trendy clothes. Also, learning does not just happen in the classroom, summer vacation affords opportunites to learn independently, which intellectually curious kids will do regardless of the school calendar.

If I was a parent, I would ignore the new calendar and take my child out of school when the original summer vacation was to start.

Less testing, longer days, four day classes with Friday lab day. NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #1
At the elementary school level, I favor all year round school.... Sekhmets Daughter Jan 2013 #3
The problem is that the tests, if misused, don't measure performance OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #6
It's a challenging problem.... good arguments can be made for a year round school. NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #8
What do they do with them now? Sekhmets Daughter Jan 2013 #10
Better ( and harder) question: What would be best for them? NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #18
When I was a kid our summers were just as important as the school year proud2BlibKansan Jan 2013 #22
Need options for parentless and/or poor kids. NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #25
I like what OmahaBlueKid1's HS does OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #4
This debate had been going on JimDandy Jan 2013 #2
I think schools should be open year-round with tri-mesters of a consistent duration & interims also patrice Jan 2013 #5
Given current obesity levels, I can't go with "less sports." OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #7
more PE = more Physical Education & that would include things such as dance, yoga, gymnastics etc. patrice Jan 2013 #9
OBKid1 says the kids like the tape programs OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #14
Oh, yeah, right. duffyduff Jan 2013 #20
Wrong on most counts. & Hypothesis: you haven't actually taught, because you patrice Jan 2013 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author savebigbird Jan 2013 #35
Your assumptions about scheduling & contracts appear to be limited by something. patrice Jan 2013 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author savebigbird Jan 2013 #40
Many more events like Newtown, you won't be able to GET them to go to school. Frustratedlady Jan 2013 #11
Wake County Year Round model mzteris Jan 2013 #12
Floating Classes -- NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #17
We had plans in place mzteris Jan 2013 #28
Great for schools with central air. noamnety Jan 2013 #13
+1 OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #15
Texas could just reduce the 45 testing days we're going to have the next 90 days, mbperrin Jan 2013 #16
Lousy idea duffyduff Jan 2013 #19
Probably the only thing I agree with Arne on. proud2BlibKansan Jan 2013 #21
+10 NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #23
Teachers are already overworked as it is. duffyduff Jan 2013 #32
ThiswillhurtEducation AProgressiveThinker Jan 2013 #24
Our students are lazier? OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #26
The best kids are better than ever exboyfil Jan 2013 #29
Bad, bad, bad idea bluestateguy Jan 2013 #27
What is wrong with letting kids be kids duffyduff Jan 2013 #31
Because they don't. proud2BlibKansan Jan 2013 #33
Uh huh. And the public is going to pay for this? Not likely. MichiganVote Jan 2013 #30
I've worked longer school years. LWolf Jan 2013 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author savebigbird Jan 2013 #36
3 weeks MINIMUM. I think we should also be asking ourselves why things can't be more patrice Jan 2013 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author savebigbird Jan 2013 #41
I worked some interesting calendars in the 90s. LWolf Jan 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Will longer school year h...»Reply #27