Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
3. Reasons for resistance are manifold.
Mon May 6, 2013, 07:48 PM
May 2013

Of the top of my head, there are administrators who insist on textbook-based instruction only, others who advocate for EDI, or explicit direct instruction, which is even worse (except in a few instances and only if used in moderation).

Especially with schools that are under improvement plans, we see extreme teacher centered and paper/pencil/textbook/workbook methods employed at the expense of hands-on and exploratory exercises.

I know teachers who so loved their school experience that they emulated it-- ELA teachers who just teach their favorite literature, nothing more, no writing applications, no research, no integration, arrrrgh!

And others who just look for the easiest to administer one-size-fits-all crap to serve day after day and year after year.

No wonder so many kids, as they get older, look more and more disengaged (comparing the typical high school student's affect to a second grader's).

We beat curiosity and creativity right out of them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Teachers Embrace 'Deep Le...»Reply #3