Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)Disaster Nationalism - How Climate Collapse Fuels Right-Wing Psychosis, Conspiracies & The Collapse Of Liberal Values [View all]
EDIT
Comparing the success of the far right in India, Brazil and the US (among other places), Seymour argues that most explanations for their rise are insufficient. What were seeing is too consistent over time and too global, to be explained by local factors such as the backlash of a fading white supremacy, or Russian troll farms, or bad actors spreading disinformation, he writes. These movements also dont have the hallmarks of historical fascism. Their immediate objective is not the overthrow of electoral democracy, Seymour observes, but a constitutional rupture breaking with all humane and woke constraints on the exercise of power. While the old establishment decomposes, the far right conjures up apocalyptic images the great replacement, Islamisation, Chinese-style communism to animate potential supporters. This is not yet a distinct form of fascism; instead, it is what Seymour calls disaster nationalism.
An examination of the far right globally, Disaster Nationalism isnt strictly about the climate crisis. But they are clearly connected. While disaster-laden fantasies capture imaginations, the environmental crisis lurks in the background. Seymour wants to interrogate this: why is fictional collapse so appealing, so exhilarating, when we live in a world of already existing, real disasters? If people are miserable, insecure and humiliated, the far right offers a specific remedy in disaster nationalism, Seymour argues. It offers the balm, not just of vengeance, but of a sort of violent reset which restores the traditional consolations of family, race, religion and nationhood, including the chance to humiliate others.
EDIT
If I agree to fantasise about gruesome, erotically charged scenarios for whose reality Ive been given no good evidence, I am not simply lacking critical skills or media literacy: the fantasy is doing something for me. It is staging something that I want, even if I dont want to want it. And if that fantasy is then adopted by numerous others, for no good reason, then the wish obviously isnt reducible to personal psychopathology but is rooted in a shared social condition, he writes in Disaster Nationalism. And that shared social condition is crucially affected and shaped by climate breakdown. The 2020 Oregon wildfires are illustrative, sweeping through the western US state after a series of chronic disasters: the credit crunch, skyrocketing rural poverty, alcoholism, suicide above the norm and a breakdown of local news, leaving Facebook and Nextdoor to fill the void. But when mostly white, rural, conservative Christians see the fires, its not climate change or capitalism they blame.
Spontaneously not orchestrated by any one person or politician it is the conspiracies theyve heard that make the most sense of something so large and so destructive: Antifa, doing the bidding of the Democrats whose aim is to usher in communism, are to blame, wanting to kill people like them to remake America. Ideas like these spread like a contagion and the threshold for their uptake isnt necessarily that high. As the fires rage, people refuse to leave, Seymour notes, so they can physically protect where they live from the arsonists they believe are behind all of this. Ecological disaster transforms into disaster created by human evil; the climate crisis turns into a crisis of interpersonal rivalry, aggression and victimhood. The destruction of the planet creates the structural conditions for these ideas but it wouldnt be possible if they werent already circulating, Seymour argues.
And hes clear on why theyre so effective. You cant shoot climate change, you cant take it to court, the same thing with capitalism. These are big, abstract forces, and you feel kind of hopeless against them, he says. Its far more attractive, exciting even, to attack a personalised enemy. All of us are susceptible to this, Seymour maintains Theres jackboots for all of us, he reminds me at the end of our interview albeit not equally.
EDIT
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/oct/30/richard-seymour-on-far-right-environmental-crisis-disaster-nationalism