Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Books on home solar? [View all]NNadir
(35,273 posts)9. It has nothing to do with the question, but rather the ethics of a mentality. Here's a safety/environmental question:
Last edited Thu Feb 6, 2025, 06:42 AM - Edit history (1)
When a Tesla burns or a Powerwall burns what are the combustion products in the presence of water of the lithium phosphorous hexafluorophosphate?
Now of course, having a serious interest in environmental issues, a professional life as a chemist, an interest in electrochemistry, and experience with hydrogen fluoride, I do have some immediate insight to that question.
For other people, there's Wikipedia:
The salt is relatively stable thermally, but loses 50% weight at 200 °C (392 °F). It hydrolyzes near 70 °C (158 °F)[3] according to the following equation forming highly toxic HF gas:
LiPF6 + 4 H2O -> LiF + 5 HF + H3PO4
LiPF6 + 4 H2O -> LiF + 5 HF + H3PO4
Lithium hexafluorophosphate
When I was a kid, I managed a peptide synthesis laboratory. Some guys that worked for me, spilled maybe 50 ml of liquid HF in the hood. I kicked them out of the lab, suited up, and cleaned it up myself with calcium carbonate, because even if they were incompetent enough to leak it - which was my fault inasmuch as their training was obviously insufficient - I didn't want them to die or suffer serious intractable chemical burns.
I thought about this chemistry when all those rich people's homes in Pacific Palisades burned. I'll bet many of them had Tesla's and solar cells, maybe the swell cadmium telluride versions of solar cells.
After all, they're not scientists (largely) but entertainers, business people and the like. Many of them have surely bought into the "solar will save the world" and "electric cars are green" bullshit that flies around from people who think that "nuclear energy is too dangerous" but burning batteries aren't, and "nuclear energy is too expensive" but a fucking burning planet isn't "too expensive."
As best I can tell, the thermal decomposition of cadmium telluride requires access to the scientific literature which I have access:
Here's a very recent paper on the topic, a timely ASAP paper: Zalak S. Kachhia, Sunil H. Chaki, Ranjan Kr. Giri, Zubin R. Parekh, Rohitkumar M. Kannaujiya, Anilkumar B. Hirpara, M.P. Deshpande, Jiten P. Tailor, Thermal decomposition study of cadmium telluride (CdTe), Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023 (In Press as of this writing)
The text:
The heating rates of 10 and 15 K⋅min−1 showed linear loss of weight above 886 K up to the analysis temperature of 1233 K, indicating compound decomposition. While for 20 K⋅min−1, a minor weight gain is discern in the range of temperature from 886 to 1081 K accompanied by weight loss above 1081 K till analysis temperature of 1233 K. The minor weight gain in case of 20 K⋅min−1 arises due to entrapment of Ar gas molecules in the pores within the analysis sample formed due to fast heating [62]. The fast heating leads to uneven heat dissemination within the sample. In uneven heat transfer, the direction having greater transport across the material generate larger decomposition, whereas the route of slow heat transfer generates less decomposition. The uneven decompositions lead to pores formation. The pores entraps Ar gas molecules leading to weight gain [33]. On further heating, the pores enlarges making entrapped Ar gas molecules to get free halting weight gain, also the sample decomposes at larger temperatures. The loss of weight is triggered by decomposition and the release of trapped Ar gas. The examination of Table 2 data shows, the magnitude weight loss increases with increase of heating rate. The increase in loss of weight for increased heating rate is due to constraint on heat spread [38], [63], [64] at high heating rate. The smooth TG curves all through the analysis temperature for all heating rates states the synthesized CdTe material is stable and of high crystalline quality. The curves of TG depicted that the synthesised CdTe dissociates in a single step above 886 K.
Now, the decomposition was followed in this case under argon in a gas jacketed TGA/DSC.
This is very different than the case in oxygen/water.
The cadmium, happily seems to be retained in the melted glass in solar cells, and most of the weight loss on the thermal heating is associated with the release of tellurium.
This said, HF dissolves glass, so I wouldn't want to breath the air where solar cells are being burned in the presence of one of Musk's Powerwalls..
As for the released tellurium, it burns in air to form tellurium tetroxide, a suspect teratogen.
Of course, the issue here isn't really about the toxicology of the ashes of Pacific Palisades. It's really about the grand success of the fucking carrying on about magical solar and batteries didn't do a fucking thing to prevent the fires, and half a century of antinuke bullshit and magical thinking about the useless, expensive, and toxic solar cells left the damned planet in flames.
There will be health consequences for the people who fought that fire, much like the WTC fires and the Iraqi burn pits.
Of course, there won't be the same carrying on about any of this that there was about Fukushima, although there's zero evidence that anyone actually died from radiation releases there and no one gives a shit about the people who died there from seawater and the resulting toxicology of the debris of a destroyed coastal city.
Got it?
No?
I couldn't care less.
If I sound angry, it may be because I am so.
I'm not amused that the sales of Teslas and Powerwalls worked to bring down one of the world's greatest and oldest democracies, and placed in the hands of a virulent racist, so there's that.
Have a swell day tomorrow.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
