Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Public Transportation and Smart Growth

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)

2. I'm gonna go with 'in areas where cars are banned from the streets'.

Reply to marmar (Original post)

Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:21 AM

Sep 2015

Motor vehicles are far more dangerous to cyclists than cyclists are to pedestrians. If the city wants to be more pedestrian friendly, then create some no-car zones and let cyclists use those streets.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sacramento Ponders: Where Should Sidewalk Cycling be Banned? [View all] marmar Sep 2015 OP

I live in Sacramento and ride a bike... David__77 Sep 2015 #1

I'm gonna go with 'in areas where cars are banned from the streets'. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #2

As far as I know, Sac has only one, K Street Mall downtown KamaAina Sep 2015 #5

K Street Mall is no more. David__77 Sep 2015 #7

Bicycle riders are given an unfortunate set of regulations yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #3

California passed a law where cars have to give bikes three feet of clearence nichomachus Sep 2015 #4

What would help the pedestrian/bicycle situation, is bicycles should shraby Sep 2015 #6

I laughed at this suggestion. David__77 Sep 2015 #8

There is a difference between a bell and a horn happyslug Sep 2015 #10

A word from a State that permit biking on sidewalks.... happyslug Sep 2015 #9