Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Public Transportation and Smart Growth

pinto

(106,886 posts)

4. Not sure. I hear both POV's. One from towns that may get bypassed and one

Reply to Vogon_Glory (Reply #3)

Tue Dec 27, 2011, 08:07 PM

Dec 2011

from land owners who may have to sell right of way rights. Don't think either are anti-rail. Seems more of a conflict with the local picture vs. the big picture.

Standard conflicts, I guess.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Plan to use Amtrak as fallback for high-speed rail criticized [View all] pinto Dec 2011 OP

I Think Amtrak WOULD Use The New Route Vogon_Glory Dec 2011 #1

Good points about shared freight / passenger rails. It's part of the history, I think. pinto Dec 2011 #2

I suspect that there's a LOT of NIMBY opposition in addition to r/wing anti-rail propaganda n/t Vogon_Glory Dec 2011 #3

Not sure. I hear both POV's. One from towns that may get bypassed and one pinto Dec 2011 #4

I'm excited by the prospects, but the resistance to high speed rail is going to be MASSIVE... NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #5

Californians for High Speed Rail - pinto Dec 2011 #6