Israel/Palestine

shira

(30,109 posts)

24. It's called occupation, not apartheid. The WB & Gaza aren't Israel.

Wed Jun 8, 2016, 01:18 PM

Jun 2016

Palestinians there are under a different legal system. If they were citizens of Israel they'd have equal rights like Israeli Arabs and Palestinians who are permanent residents.

Where's that definition of Apartheid I keep asking you for? It should be clear from that definition that Israel falls into the category. Otherwise they don't.

and is currently the only country that practises Apartheid.

Better cases for Apartheid than Israel...

Apartheid alive and well in Australia
http://www.herald.co.zw/apartheid-alive-and-well-in-australia/

Lebanese apartheid
http://friendsoflebanon.org/archives/1258

Now prove they aren't Apartheid. Go on...

Which countries say Israel is apartheid other than fascist ones? Not even HRW or Amnesty calls Israel Apartheid and they're the top 2 human rights organizations on the planet. Why do you think that is?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Mosby Jun 2016 OP

It must really suck to be a country that must past laws to suppress opposition to apartheid. Purveyor Jun 2016 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jun 2016 #2

Spain is passing those laws against BDS. It's because BDS is a hate movement. n/t shira Jun 2016 #3

The current israeli gov't is also, most certainly a "hate movement". eom Purveyor Jun 2016 #4

Well, at least that's progress. You basically conceded... shira Jun 2016 #26

Frustrating for supporters of the bigoted BDS movement King_David Jun 2016 #5

They protecting a Jewish minority against hate. King_David Jun 2016 #6

Ever notice the BDS'ers never speak out against the rising rate of hate.... shira Jun 2016 #7

I'm opposed to Apartheid, so I think the Spanish decision is wrong. Little Tich Jun 2016 #8

Wrong link FBaggins Jun 2016 #9

The existence of Ariel U is in breach of the Fourth Geneva convention which prohibits the transfer Little Tich Jun 2016 #10

Nope FBaggins Jun 2016 #11

The consensus is that the settlements have to go. Little Tich Jun 2016 #12

You have a right to your own opinion, but not your own facts FBaggins Jun 2016 #19

The current location of the settlements is making any Palestinian development and economic growth Little Tich Jun 2016 #22

Your sources are the UN and ACRI (associated with BDS)..... shira Jun 2016 #25

For the sake of argument - do you know of any other studies of the Palestinian economy with Little Tich Jun 2016 #28

Promoting "equal rights" in Israel via a Muslim Arab majority w/Hamas in charge.... shira Jun 2016 #29

4th Geneva refers to Nazis transferring the Jewish population in Europe.... shira Jun 2016 #14

Wikipedia: International law and Israeli settlements Little Tich Jun 2016 #15

The UN? What a joke. Article from today, just one hour ago actually... shira Jun 2016 #17

It's been proven to you that the Apartheid charge is total BS shira Jun 2016 #13

I don't consider your own assertions to be proof enough. Little Tich Jun 2016 #16

My assertions can be backed by fact. Yours can't.... shira Jun 2016 #18

In every country except Israel, all civilians in an area are ruled by the same laws. Little Tich Jun 2016 #20

What country is this occuring in? FBaggins Jun 2016 #21

There are some seriously deluded persons in the Knesset and others living in the West Bank and East Little Tich Jun 2016 #23

It's called occupation, not apartheid. The WB & Gaza aren't Israel. shira Jun 2016 #24

The occupation changed to Apartheid the moment an Israeli civilian moved in to occupied territory Little Tich Jun 2016 #27

"I don't believe that there's Apartheid in Israel either, just discrimination." shira Jun 2016 #30

There's a huge difference between Israel and the occupied territories - Little Tich Jun 2016 #31

Where's that definition of Apartheid? You can't find one that fits for the territories.... shira Jun 2016 #32