Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
13. By it's singular focus on Israel, the UN effectively absolves all other nations' occupations.
Fri Sep 16, 2016, 05:52 AM
Sep 2016

Which is totally okay with the Israel haters, BTW. So long as the Jews are paying, anything goes.

This unusual grade of obsessive, self-destructive antipathy is a hallmark of classical eliminationist anti-Semitism. Unlike ordinary intergroup prejudice “found in the suspicion and resentment which are often directed against neighbors of another tribe, another race, another faith, or from another place,”explains historian Bernard Lewis, anti-Semitism is a “special and peculiar hatred” that attributes to Jews “secret and diabolical power.”

Against such a perceived enemy, no sacrifice is too great. Nazi Germany’s diversion of much-needed resources in the final months of World War II from fighting the Red Army (and providing for the escape of German refugees) to exterminating more Jews makes sense only to someone who sees the latter as a cosmic evil.

Although anti-Semites often go to great pains to avoid expressing their hatred as anti-Jewish (indeed, they coined the term “anti-Semitism” itself as a politically correct euphemism for Judenhass), this unique cognitive signature is easy enough to spot—just take a measurement of what the subjects are prepared to sacrifice to harm Jews.

http://legalinsurrection.com/2016/09/viewing-bds-as-a-settler-colonial-ideology-is-gaining-traction/#more

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Reminds me of a good rule of thumb: don't attack your neighbor without provocation. jonno99 Sep 2016 #1
Amen leftynyc Sep 2016 #3
I call BS on the OP. Little Tich Sep 2016 #2
From what I can see, your documents are about what "was". The OP is about what "IS". jonno99 Sep 2016 #4
The Moroccan occupation of West Sahara is still ongoing - just ask Ban Ki Moon. n/t Little Tich Sep 2016 #6
It is a very simple point: jonno99 Sep 2016 #8
It's very simple. Your opponent knows damned well how simple & factual the point is. n/t shira Sep 2016 #10
By it's singular focus on Israel, the UN effectively absolves all other nations' occupations. shira Sep 2016 #13
I seem to be the only one who actually reads the UN resolutions about occupied territories. Little Tich Sep 2016 #16
Maybe we should do a word search & comparison on the phrase "deeply deplores"... shira Sep 2016 #19
Me? I have nothing to prove - you go ahead and have fun with the resolutions... n/t Little Tich Sep 2016 #20
The OP includes verbs like "deplore".... shira Sep 2016 #21
I'll let you have all the fun reading and comparing the UN resolutions... Little Tich Sep 2016 #22
You're not responding to the precise terminology from the OP. shira Sep 2016 #5
The Moroccan occupation of West Sahara was specifically mentioned in the OP. Little Tich Sep 2016 #7
Sure, so find how many times Morocco is described as the "Occupying Power". shira Sep 2016 #9
The simplest way to refute an argument is to prove that its negation is true, which I've already Little Tich Sep 2016 #11
And you haven't refuted anything. Nice try with the bullshit. shira Sep 2016 #12
As the saying goes- jonno99 Sep 2016 #14
Your argument is to prove Morocco being an "occupying power" isn't synonymous... shira Sep 2016 #15
If you could perhaps take a look at S/RES/1483 (2003) that I linked to in post #2? Little Tich Sep 2016 #17
Problem is you don't read too well. Here's what the OP states... shira Sep 2016 #18
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»At the U.N., Only Israel ...»Reply #13