Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
26. I don't like the thought of Jewish people having to keep a packed suitcase under their beds, just in
Thu Oct 13, 2016, 08:54 PM
Oct 2016

case - it goes against everything I believe in. Nobody should have to feel unsafe in their own country, especially not in a democracy. If the events in the IB Times actually happened (In these times of hasbara, nothing is certain, but it's certainly plausible) as described, then it's just awful and a clear example how a democracy can fail in upholding its core values.

But I don't think that issue should be connected with the right of return for Palestinians. If there wouldn't have been any ethnic cleansing, there would have been a Jewish State as per the 1947 partition plan with a possible Palestinian majority, as those 700.000 Palestinians would've stayed put and they and their descendants would have been Israelis. I don't want to trip you, but you have criticized me for being against the 1947 Partition Plan, which if it would have been implemented may well have resulted in a Jewish State with a Palestinian majority. Or are you suggesting that the removal of 700.000 Palestinians would have happened either way, and perhaps that the idea of a Jewish State was wholly contingent on their removal?

Personally, I have no fear of widespread immigration or immigrants from any country. Perhaps that's why I have difficulties understanding your notion of Palestinians as a threat. I truly believe that people can get along just fine if they want to.

As an athiest... kristopher Oct 2016 #1
It's more than that. aranthus Oct 2016 #2
Good point. Giving up a nation's sovereignty peacefully is absurd & unheard of. shira Oct 2016 #17
I'm opposed to Zionism because I'm against all forms of nationalism that promote ethnic superiority Little Tich Oct 2016 #3
What's racist is actively opposing Jewish nationalism & no other. n/t shira Oct 2016 #5
What's racist is that your dissolving of the Jewish state leads to dead Jews. shira Oct 2016 #16
London's Ultra Orthodox Jews run daily gauntlet of anti-Semitic abuse shira Oct 2016 #25
I don't like the thought of Jewish people having to keep a packed suitcase under their beds, just in Little Tich Oct 2016 #26
You don't like the thought but that's the situation you prefer for Israeli Jews. shira Oct 2016 #27
Maybe I shouldn't do this, but... Little Tich Oct 2016 #4
What do u disagree with? You know what antisemitism is while no one else does? n/t shira Oct 2016 #6
The "new" definition of anti-Semitism that includes criticism of Israel as a form of anti-Semitism Little Tich Oct 2016 #7
You're a self-appointed expert on racism. Everyone else is dumb... shira Oct 2016 #8
I don't think that my views on what constitutes racism differs from the average person Little Tich Oct 2016 #9
I used your definition to prove writings from Mondoweiss & Gideon Levy.... shira Oct 2016 #10
You have only proved to yourself that those writings were racist. Little Tich Oct 2016 #11
I used your criteria & proved it, but let's compare. Here's Gideon Levy... shira Oct 2016 #12
I challenge you to find someone at JPost more racist & vile than Gideon Levy. shira Oct 2016 #13
In addition to Caroline Glick at the Jerusalem Post, I'll provide an example from the Israeli Minist Little Tich Oct 2016 #14
Not to defend Glick, but how is this at all racist? aranthus Oct 2016 #20
For defining racism, I'll just go with "feelings of antipathy towards an ethnic group"... Little Tich Oct 2016 #21
For defining racism I go with a dictionary. aranthus Oct 2016 #22
Your definition that racism only includes racial groups is too narrow in scope and completely Little Tich Oct 2016 #23
It's the dictionary's definition, not mine. aranthus Oct 2016 #24
Before I respond to your examples, do we agree Gideon Levy is racist? shira Oct 2016 #15
Oops, seems like I forgot about Gideon Levy. Little Tich Oct 2016 #18
How is Glick worse than Levy? Explain by comparison please. n/t shira Oct 2016 #19
Rabbi Sacks on Antizionism = Antisemitism... shira Oct 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Why Anti-Zionists Who Say...»Reply #26