Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: UNESCO Adopts Controversial Jerusalem Resolution [View all]shira
(30,109 posts)14. J-Street says UNESCO vote shows contempt for Jewish people's ties to Temple Mount
J Street is profoundly disappointed by todays adoption by member states of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Executive Board of a resolution that outrageously seeks to rewrite history by erasing the Jewish peoples deep historical and religious ties to the Temple Mount, known in Hebrew as Har HaBayit.
http://jstreet.org/press-releases/resolution-adopted-unesco-member-states-shows-contempt-jewish-peoples-ties-temple-mount/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The U.S., Britain, Germany, Holland, Lithuania and Estonia voted against the resolution.
oberliner
Oct 2016
#1
It's never a good thing when a fascist leader starts gobbling up parts of neighboring countries in
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#17
According to international law, Russia is an occupying power in Ukrainian Crimea, not a sovereign.
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#34
I hope you understand that it's not even a de facto annexation until every single Palestinian
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#46
If there's no legal framework for how wars are waged, it will open up for all kinds of atrocities,
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#16
I'm not sure a 2-state proposal exists that puts the wall in a future Palestinian state.
shira
Oct 2016
#23
Why is it so wrong to extend the notion of democratic rights to include Palestinians?
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#29
You seem to be working under the assumption that an anti-Israel resolution condemning Israel's
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#33
Aha - so that's why I didn't find any anti-Semitism in the resolution itself...
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#39
The release is accurate, stop with the denial. While the resolution says Jerusalem...
shira
Oct 2016
#40
If the allegations that Israel was changing the status quo in Jerusalem were untrue,
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#41