Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]sabbat hunter
(6,893 posts)17. I said that all the settlers
should either leave with compensation, or if they stay, they are ruled by Palestine, thus no break up of a continuous state of Palestine in the WB.
Jerusalem was never intended to be a part of Palestine, so it should not go to them.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your premise is flawed. Israel's occupation is legal. So there goes your argument.
shira
Nov 2016
#34
Greek Cypriots do bring up the Geneva Convention with respect to Turkish settlers in N Cyprus
oberliner
Nov 2016
#37
That is exactly what it is. The authors have taken sides just in the wording of the entire article,
still_one
Nov 2016
#26
This suggestion seems far more viable than anything above here in this thread. eom
appal_jack
Nov 2016
#12
Probably, but it's an interesting idea. That proposal would eliminate the need....
shira
Nov 2016
#19