Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
Showing Original Post only (View all)trumps envoy: new administration won't tell israel what policies to adopt [View all]
http://www.timesofisrael.com/trumps-israel-envoy-new-administration-wont-tell-israel-what-policies-to-adopt/But Friedmans declared appetite to move the embassy is not the only reason liberal Jewish organizations have responded to his nomination with something close to horror. The 57-year-old bankruptcy lawyer has also been an outspoken and active supporter of the settlement movement, and has argued that Israel doesnt face a demographic threat to its Jewish character if it fails to separate from the Palestinians.
...
In June, Friedman accused J Street supporters of being far worse than kapos in a column for the right-wing, pro-settlement Israel National News website, using the term for Jews who aided Nazis during the Holocaust. Speaking before the Brookings Institutions annual Saban Forum earlier this month, he refused to walk back his comparison.
..
Unlike Obama, who made Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank a fundamental issue of criticism throughout his presidency, Trump will not put his finger on the scale or tell Israel what policies they should adopt, Friedman said, adding that his new boss doesnt see Israel as in need of any particular correction at this point.
That principle, he indicated, covers both how Trump will treat the settlement issue and the manner in which Israel seeks to reach an agreement with the Palestinians. The Trump administration will not dictate to Israel where it can and cannot build in the West Bank, according to Friedman.
...
Friedman stated that, in his discussions with Trump, a two-state solution is not a priority. I dont think he is wed to any particular outcome. A two-state solution is a way, but its not the only way.
Unlike the last three presidents, who have tried to push both parties into negotiating a compromise, Trump will let the Israel make its determinations without pressure from the US, said Friedman.
A Trump administration will try to be helpful with the Israelis bringing stability to the region, to make it as quiet as possible, as peaceful as possible, and ultimately to come up with a long-term solution, he said. As far as what that solution is, Trump will be guided by the Israelis view, very much so, and will not be seeking to impose any particular path upon the Israeli government.
...
In June, Friedman accused J Street supporters of being far worse than kapos in a column for the right-wing, pro-settlement Israel National News website, using the term for Jews who aided Nazis during the Holocaust. Speaking before the Brookings Institutions annual Saban Forum earlier this month, he refused to walk back his comparison.
..
Unlike Obama, who made Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank a fundamental issue of criticism throughout his presidency, Trump will not put his finger on the scale or tell Israel what policies they should adopt, Friedman said, adding that his new boss doesnt see Israel as in need of any particular correction at this point.
That principle, he indicated, covers both how Trump will treat the settlement issue and the manner in which Israel seeks to reach an agreement with the Palestinians. The Trump administration will not dictate to Israel where it can and cannot build in the West Bank, according to Friedman.
...
Friedman stated that, in his discussions with Trump, a two-state solution is not a priority. I dont think he is wed to any particular outcome. A two-state solution is a way, but its not the only way.
Unlike the last three presidents, who have tried to push both parties into negotiating a compromise, Trump will let the Israel make its determinations without pressure from the US, said Friedman.
A Trump administration will try to be helpful with the Israelis bringing stability to the region, to make it as quiet as possible, as peaceful as possible, and ultimately to come up with a long-term solution, he said. As far as what that solution is, Trump will be guided by the Israelis view, very much so, and will not be seeking to impose any particular path upon the Israeli government.
This is what it means to be the most pro-Israel administration possible. Much more pro-Israel than Clinton would have been, much moreso than either President Bush, and WAY more pro-Israel than Obama.
Downside, of course, is that the US's opinion on Israel will have zero sway in liberal democracies around the world.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
71 replies, 9259 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
trumps envoy: new administration won't tell israel what policies to adopt [View all]
geek tragedy
Dec 2016
OP
Most liberal country in the Middle East is like being the tallest resident in Hobbiton.
geek tragedy
Dec 2016
#7
Jimmy Carter: "I know that Israel is a wonderful democracy with equal treatment..."
shira
Dec 2016
#18
Well at least you are acknowledging that your opinion is the opposite of Obama's
oberliner
Dec 2016
#25
I agree that the J Street position ought to be considered a pro Israel position
oberliner
Dec 2016
#33
He did appoint a new ambassador to Israel who supports moving the embassy to Jerusalem
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#29
Well, yes, the pro-Israel community amongst Democrats is less than absolute
geek tragedy
Dec 2016
#63
He had every Security Council resolution that was even mildly critical of the Occupation vetoed.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#28
I disagree with the assessment that this is the "most pro-Israel administration possible"
still_one
Dec 2016
#9
being pro-Israel and doing what's best for Israel are two very different things
geek tragedy
Dec 2016
#10
For one thing the republican party platform has rejected the Iran nuclear deal as binding on the
still_one
Dec 2016
#11
Well yeah, Israel is a friendly loyal democracy, it's neighbors are tyrannical....
shira
Dec 2016
#22