Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hack89

(39,180 posts)
23. Wasn't the basement mainly open space?
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 04:03 PM
Nov 2015

so when the building fell on top of those spaces, they collapsed - creating a big hole that was filled with debris from the falling towers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What a paranoia driven cognitive dissonance looks like e.g. David Chandler William Seger Nov 2015 #1
Chandler's correct! You are not! wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #2
The floor pans did not get more robust lower in the structure. hack89 Nov 2015 #3
show me the specs that prove your claim or else you... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #4
Why would it slow if the falling mass was getting heavier every second? hack89 Nov 2015 #6
much of that "falling mass" wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #7
So it didn't collapse in its own footprint? hack89 Nov 2015 #8
7 did yes... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #9
Since the collapse left a towering pile of debris that filled a massive hole in the ground hack89 Nov 2015 #10
you'd be wrong... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #11
So you are denying there was a huge pile of debris that fill a huge hole in the ground? hack89 Nov 2015 #12
so now you are saying... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #13
Pretty much. How else would heavy objects fall except straight down? hack89 Nov 2015 #15
so how did wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #21
Wasn't the basement mainly open space? hack89 Nov 2015 #23
Relatively little debris was going over the side William Seger Nov 2015 #16
well that's obvious bullshit! wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #22
A lot of dust and the external walls hack89 Nov 2015 #24
RELATIVELY little debris was going over the side William Seger Nov 2015 #25
We've been through all this before William Seger Nov 2015 #5
you are embarrasing the board not I. wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #14
"And Chandler shows how he comes to his conclusions which you cannot do." William Seger Nov 2015 #17
did you do the wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #18
No need to hunt for math errors William Seger Nov 2015 #19
so you can't. ok. n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #20
so you won't. ok. n/t William Seger Nov 2015 #26
but I did William... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #27
are you asserting there was... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #28
No, I'm saying there was no "uniform" resistance to produce "constant" acceleration William Seger Nov 2015 #29
akin to that ridiculous wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #30
You're ignoring gravity William Seger Nov 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»What a Gravity Driven Dem...»Reply #23