... from "truther" propaganda sites, apparently without attempting to verify the facts or think through the "logic," so perhaps you should take your own advice about being "more objective and less prone to being herded." (And btw, one of the last things anyone should worry about is being "highly suspect" by a conspiracist. People who saw the goddamn planes fly into the buildings and the people who cleaned up the mess are "highly suspect" by such folks. To some of those assholes, the people who died are "highly suspect."
Looking though your list, I've got a buck that says you can't produce a shred of credible evidence or logically valid and factually sound argument that either refutes a significant detail of the "official story" or offers a more plausible and logically coherent explanation for the credible evidence.
(ETA: This is NOT an invitation to copy and paste a wall of text from some "truther" site. Take your best shot at what you think is your best argument, in your own words.)
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read