Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

Showing Original Post only (View all)

JohnyCanuck

(9,922 posts)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:43 PM Nov 2015

Forensic engineer/university prof to run an open evaluation of the NIST WTC 7 collapse model [View all]



World Trade Center Building 7 Evaluation is an engineering study at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) using finite element modeling to evaluate the possible causes of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse. The study is being conducted by Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, Chair of UAF's Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, and two Ph.D. research assistants. Professionals from the fields of structural engineering, civil engineering, mechanical engineering, architecture, building design and construction, physics, math, and science, as well as everyday citizens, are invited to get involved. Every aspect of the scientific process will be posted on http://WTC7Evaluation.org. The study is being crowd-funded by the nonprofit organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Also more background on this project here:

About Dr. Hulsey

Dr. Hulsey is a professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) and the Chair of UAF’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. He brings decades of experience in failure analysis and modeling of structures.

In May, he and his team of Ph.D. research assistants began a two-year process of modeling WTC 7. Using the sophisticated computer models they are developing, Dr. Hulsey and his team will evaluate the probability of various hypothetical causes of WTC 7’s collapse.

AE911Truth, backed by our 2,390 architects and engineers, is funding Dr. Hulsey’s research because it is imperative to our mission that WTC 7 finally be modeled in a transparent and unbiased process — and that the findings be disseminated to every corner of the engineering community. Already we’re seeing tremendous interest in the study, as several local engineering groups have invited Dr. Hulsey to speak about his work.

When awareness of the study spreads throughout the entire engineering field and Dr. Hulsey begins to publish his findings, it will be a turning point in how the destruction of WTC 7 is viewed — both within the engineering world and beyond.

http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=d5e38f3000&e=[UNIQID]
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
thanks for posting. looking forward to it. Check this video... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #1
Sounds like the Prof is on top of things. JohnyCanuck Nov 2015 #2
k&r nationalize the fed Nov 2015 #3
I wonder how whitefordmd Nov 2015 #4
you are... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #5
Thanks for the typo correction whitefordmd Nov 2015 #6
that depend upon wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #7
You're avoiding the issue.... whitefordmd Nov 2015 #11
No. They're not "my guys". wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #13
Look at the damned NIST report: dougolat Dec 2015 #28
"good enough" for what purpose? William Seger Dec 2015 #29
There you go again with that 'silent explosives' canard. dougolat Dec 2015 #30
The thermite hypothesis was invented by Steven Jones... William Seger Dec 2015 #32
To what NIST report are you referring? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #31
The study is already biased before it begins William Seger Nov 2015 #8
unike NIST wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #9
If the study shows that fire could have destroyed WTC7 William Seger Nov 2015 #10
I accept that now! wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #12
Very interesting William Seger Dec 2015 #14
nope! wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #16
Watch THIS video William Seger Dec 2015 #17
do you realize wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #18
And if they needed magical silent explosives to do that William Seger Dec 2015 #19
Silent demolitions? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #20
I doubt it would be silent but wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #22
Ok not silent, but concealed. whitefordmd Dec 2015 #24
the demos were not wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #25
I think I am getting it whitefordmd Dec 2015 #26
You Do Realize That Physics Do Not Support Such Nonsense ProfessorGAC Dec 2015 #33
well that's obvious bullshit! wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #34
Just curious whitefordmd Dec 2015 #15
NIST described some of the "fiddling" they did William Seger Dec 2015 #21
well that's more nonsense but wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #23
Why is that nonsense? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Forensic engineer/univers...»Reply #0