Creative Speculation

He has one of the most annoying voices I've ever heard, which makes his bullshit that much harder to listen to.

> Finally, Gruener offers his take on the low blow that Boston Globe columnist Alex Beam delivered to “truthers” who dare speak up about the solid evidence that the three World Trade Center towers were destroyed by controlled demolition.

You guys can keep kidding yourselves, but if there actual was any "solid evidence" of a controlled demolition, you wouldn't be considered a bunch crackpots by rational people. Really. But, I guess if you understood what "rational" means, I wouldn't have to tell you that. "It looked like a CD so it must have been one" is not solid evidence, and neither is "I don't understand this." When you try to go beyond that and try to pass off easily debunked bullshit as "solid evidence," you are the ones giving "conspiracy theorists" a bad reputation, not Alex Beam.