Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,297 posts)

8. The study is already biased before it begins

Mon Nov 30, 2015, 08:49 AM

Nov 2015

The announcement of the study should have come with a spoiler alert because it also announces the result they intend to get: They intend to disprove the NIST "probably cause" hypothesis so they can use that result for the express purpose of recruiting new cult members. Fiddling with a computer model until it produces the results you want is not that hard, which is the criticism that "truthers" level against the NIST model in the first place, so I think it's pretty easy to predict how this will play out.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Forensic engineer/university prof to run an open evaluation of the NIST WTC 7 collapse model [View all] JohnyCanuck Nov 2015 OP

thanks for posting. looking forward to it. Check this video... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #1

Sounds like the Prof is on top of things. JohnyCanuck Nov 2015 #2

k&r nationalize the fed Nov 2015 #3

I wonder how whitefordmd Nov 2015 #4

you are... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #5

Thanks for the typo correction whitefordmd Nov 2015 #6

that depend upon wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #7

You're avoiding the issue.... whitefordmd Nov 2015 #11

No. They're not "my guys". wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #13

Look at the damned NIST report: dougolat Dec 2015 #28

"good enough" for what purpose? William Seger Dec 2015 #29

There you go again with that 'silent explosives' canard. dougolat Dec 2015 #30

The thermite hypothesis was invented by Steven Jones... William Seger Dec 2015 #32

To what NIST report are you referring? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #31

The study is already biased before it begins William Seger Nov 2015 #8

unike NIST wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #9

If the study shows that fire could have destroyed WTC7 William Seger Nov 2015 #10

I accept that now! wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #12

Very interesting William Seger Dec 2015 #14

nope! wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #16

Watch THIS video William Seger Dec 2015 #17

do you realize wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #18

And if they needed magical silent explosives to do that William Seger Dec 2015 #19

Silent demolitions? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #20

I doubt it would be silent but wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #22

Ok not silent, but concealed. whitefordmd Dec 2015 #24

the demos were not wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #25

I think I am getting it whitefordmd Dec 2015 #26

You Do Realize That Physics Do Not Support Such Nonsense ProfessorGAC Dec 2015 #33

well that's obvious bullshit! wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #34

Just curious whitefordmd Dec 2015 #15

NIST described some of the "fiddling" they did William Seger Dec 2015 #21

well that's more nonsense but wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #23

Why is that nonsense? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #27