Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

In reply to the discussion: Three men [View all]

William Seger

(11,258 posts)
5. The American Spectator agrees with you
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 01:11 AM
Dec 2015

(I won't post a link to that nearly-defunct rightwing cesspool, but here's their take.)

If these questions remain unanswered, it is impossible to believe anything other than the most reasonable explanation for the silence: the progressive agenda of multiculturalism, diversity and political correctness must be preserved, even if truth is the ultimate casualty.


Perhaps there was a third shooter who got away. But if there's no other evidence (yet!), what do you expect the "corporate media bullhorn" to report other than the fact that some witnesses say there was a third shooter? And why do you presuppose that if evidence does turn up, they'll cover it up?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Three men»Reply #5