Creative Speculation

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)

6. The problem is that the discrepancies haven't been explained.

Thu Dec 17, 2015, 06:58 PM

Dec 2015

I heard the Sally Abdelmageed interview and others replayed and discussed repeatedly that afternoon and then that night heard Bowdich and Burguan say the shooters were a quiet county health inspector from Redlands and his foreign wife and that they killed or injured at least 35 people in four minutes. Maybe so but that's a big change. So what conclusion should we draw? I don't know but I don't see any harm in asking. Democracy isn't served by aiding and abetting corruption.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Three men [View all] Jesus Malverde Dec 2015 OP

So, what's your Creative Speculation? William Seger Dec 2015 #1

I think this was posted to show that sometimes the initial reports are often wrong. zappaman Dec 2015 #2

San Bernardino Resident posts AMA at Reddit. Post locked. nationalize the fed Dec 2015 #3

Yet again, when the details contradict the headlines... dougolat Dec 2015 #4

The American Spectator agrees with you William Seger Dec 2015 #5

The problem is that the discrepancies haven't been explained. ucrdem Dec 2015 #6

I don't see any harm in asking, either William Seger Dec 2015 #7