Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

In reply to the discussion: implosion: [View all]

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
18. Inquiry.
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 05:20 PM
Dec 2015

Wouldn't it save the mysterious lizard overlords a lot of effort to simply order one Port Authority structural engineer to declare the buildings unsafe for habitation after the impacts and fire, and then simply demolish them 'normally'?

And then cast a steely lizard gaze at the insurance adjustors and order them to declare the buildings a total loss, and pay up?

I'm not clear why the smoke stained, hole-punched condemned buildings, later demolished to pomp and circumstance, doesn't solve all the purposes you have ascribed here WRT a pearl-harbor-like casus belli? Help me out, I'm not good with conspiracies.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

implosion: [View all] wildbilln864 Dec 2015 OP
It's a lovely implosion video. Is there a point in sharing? nt whitefordmd Dec 2015 #1
Yup, and here is what a real controlled demolition sounds like: William Seger Dec 2015 #2
notice how... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #3
So the explosions were set off when the planes impacted and not at the time of collapse? Nt hack89 Dec 2015 #4
Yes, that's what he believes William Seger Dec 2015 #5
I could only guess but wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #6
But thermite does not produce "squibs" hack89 Dec 2015 #7
no I don't agree... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #9
Any idea how much thermite will burn in an hour? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #8
so what? wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #10
So let me see if I understand whitefordmd Dec 2015 #11
hmmm... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #12
"quick removal & disposal of evidence." whitefordmd Dec 2015 #13
so you didn't know... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #14
I don't believe that happend whitefordmd Dec 2015 #15
clues: wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #16
Am i supposed to believe 9 to 12 months is a whitefordmd Dec 2015 #17
Inquiry. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #18
don't know what kind of ignorant stupidity you're rambling on about but it wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #19
Thank you for completely answering my question. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #20
didn't notice a question amidst wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #21
Oh, you understood me perfectly the first time. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #22
don't be afraid..... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #23
Post 18 contains the question. AtheistCrusader Jan 2016 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»implosion»Reply #18