Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

JohnyCanuck

(9,922 posts)

4. The professor gives NIST an F for their WTC 7 computer model.

Reply to JohnyCanuck (Reply #2)

Mon Sep 12, 2016, 06:04 AM

Sep 2016

In the following video around the 12 minute mark Professor Hulsey, while addressing a panel of lawyers at last weekend's Justice in Focus symposium in NYC, says if he was presented a model like the NIST computer model by a PhD student, the student would have flunked.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Canadian Civil Engineering Researchers Disprove Official Explanation of WTC 7’s Destruction [View all] JohnyCanuck Sep 2016 OP

using the maximum amounts allowed in the building codes whitefordmd Sep 2016 #1

University of Alaska Prof and forensic engineering specialist says fires did not bring down WTC 7. JohnyCanuck Sep 2016 #2

so tell me something I don't know! I already knew that official nonsense was wrong so... wildbilln864 Sep 2016 #3

The professor gives NIST an F for their WTC 7 computer model. JohnyCanuck Sep 2016 #4

Hulsey gets an F in logic William Seger Sep 2016 #5

what I do realize is that some message board posters wildbilln864 Sep 2016 #6

Exactly William Seger Sep 2016 #7

yes exactly! I have been finding more credibility in wildbilln864 Sep 2016 #8