Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)

6. Why so angry?

Reply to Cooley Hurd (Reply #5)

Sat May 6, 2017, 05:44 PM

May 2017

You proved it? Really? So you have the raw data used by NIST to construct their computer model? So why don't you post a link? Until then you haven't proved anything. An opinion is not a fact.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why haven't NIST released the modeling data for building 7? [View all] gyroscope May 2017 OP

Politics? haele May 2017 #1

Like Silverstein, Giuliani said he knew twin towers were going to collapse gyroscope May 2017 #2

The FDNY was monitoring a bulge in the side of the building for several hours before the collapse hack89 May 2017 #11

LOL gyroscope May 2017 #12

The 9/11 commission didn't discuss WTC 7 hack89 May 2017 #13

Nonsense. WTC7 came down because WTC1 fell on it... Cooley Hurd May 2017 #3

Prove it gyroscope May 2017 #4

I did 15 yrs ago on this very forum... Cooley Hurd May 2017 #5

Why so angry? gyroscope May 2017 #6

Donate to DU and do a search yourself... Cooley Hurd May 2017 #7

LMAO like arguing with a Trump supporter gyroscope May 2017 #8

The data is available Theobald May 2017 #9

Available for $30 payment gyroscope May 2017 #10

You stated the data wasn't available Theobald Jun 2017 #14

Again, how do you know? gyroscope Jun 2017 #15