Creative Speculation

> Can you show me another "plane-shaped crater" in a field?!

Um, no, that's not how this "debunking" stuff works. You're the one who claims to be able to refute the "official story," so you're the one tasked with show-and-tell. Show me another 757 that crashed at over 500 MPH nose-first into a reclaimed strip mine and didn't make a plane-shaped crater, or give me logical reason why a 757 crashing at over 500 MPH nose-first into a reclaimed strip mine shouldn't make a plane-shaped crater. Your personal incredulity is not even interesting.

> Radar. lol. There were many phantom blips on the radar that day, many from the WAR GAMES going on that morning. Remember?

Irrelevant, even if it were true (and it's not, for FAA screens), because the flight path shown in the NTSB report is from recorded radar data, not from what people saw or didn't see on their screens that day.

> Also why didn't the control tower at Johnstown see this 757 when they tried to physical spot it with binoculars?

Um, maybe they weren't looking in the right place?

> Why did all the few witnesses contradict the official crash angle; 90 degrees vs. 40 degrees?

You're confused: One witness reported seeing UA 93 flying overhead and banking at 90 degrees, but no witnesses saw the final crash. The FDR data shows that it was inverted, 180 degrees, when it crashed. The 40 degrees is the nose-down angle of impact. Since the plane would necessarily be banked at 90 degrees on its way to being inverted 180 degrees, there is no contradiction.

> Why did so many witnesses report a small white aircraft BEFORE the "crash" and reported an aircraft flying over Indian Lake immediately after, a trajectory the official one flew over?

My first hunch would be that there was a small white aircraft in the area before the crash, but it's also possible for witnesses to simply be mistaken. Turns out, in this case it was the former; there was a small personal jet in the area and it circled back over the crash site.

> DNA. lol. Not a single drop of blood at the scene reported by the coroner, so DNA from all 44 passengers, but no blood. Yeah, right. Kills me how much weight you put behind alleged DNA evidence, the easiest for govt conspirators to make up.

"Not a single drop of blood" but lots of human flesh. You continue a pattern of willful ignorance of the facts. It kills me how much weight you put on simply declaring that all the evidence was faked, without a shadow of a reason.

> How did a 155 foot plane buried, yet leaves a crater only 8-10 ft deep?

Because it plowed into the loosely packed dirt of a reclaimed strip mine. I'm sure you knew that would be the answer, but once again your personal incredulity is not even interesting.

I'm not sure why you bothered posting this, really.