Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,049 posts)

45. No new info there, either

Fri Oct 12, 2012, 06:50 PM

Oct 2012

... and the issues raised in that article have been addressed many times. For example, the main claim is that the 2.25 seconds of WTC7 free-fall is not explained by the NIST theory. Yes, it is, and the explanation is much better than their "scientific" controlled demolition theory.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

50 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Building 7 Conspiracy Fans - Here you go - Building 7 Explained logically.... [View all] Logical Jan 2012 OP

'Collapsed simply due to uncontrolled fires' gyroscope Jan 2012 #1

Why not just blow out a couple floors deconstruct911 Jan 2012 #2

Think again! Other structures have been brought down with only fires..... Logical Jan 2012 #3

Is the building demolition industry aware of that? gyroscope Jan 2012 #5

Fire can also bring down bridges, but I think they still prefer to use jackhammers and equipment.... Logical Jan 2012 #8

Bay bridge collapse gyroscope Jan 2012 #12

Since WTC7 severely damaged the neighboring buildings when it collapsed, I doubt this will catch on. cpwm17 Jan 2012 #11

LOL! Politicalboi Mar 2012 #15

I noticed that you didn't respond to my point about Fiterman Hall OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #4

Never heard of it gyroscope Jan 2012 #6

the year is 2012 OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #7

So, you know this? dougolat Sep 2012 #43

Great point. But logic does not apply to many here!! n-t Logical Jan 2012 #9

You're right it doesn't Politicalboi Mar 2012 #16

Over a year ago I attended a lecture by the NIST scientist... reACTIONary Dec 2012 #48

DUzy! Lol. (nt) (nr) T S Justly Jan 2012 #10

Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #13

Nope! Politicalboi Mar 2012 #14

When exactly sabbat hunter Mar 2012 #17

Great, you just compared an apple to a brick. AtheistCrusader Aug 2012 #19

Yes WTC 7 was fragile LOL! Politicalboi Mar 2012 #18

"Larry Silverstein saying "pull it"?" jberryhill Aug 2012 #20

And what does "pull it" mean? zappaman Aug 2012 #21

That's not as interesting jberryhill Aug 2012 #22

Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #23

Um, clarify please? Ruby the Liberal Aug 2012 #24

First contact with an alien life form! CJCRANE Aug 2012 #25

I respect emigrants who take the time to speak our language, as we're monolingual in the USA. freshwest Aug 2012 #41

We are among you now Nasty Gash Aug 2012 #26

Modern humans have been on earth for 200,000 years by most estimates. hlthe2b Aug 2012 #27

modern human does not = civilization Kali Aug 2012 #28

I said "civilization" Nasty Gash Aug 2012 #31

hello and welcome, Nasty Gash magical thyme Aug 2012 #38

Hi, being from another planet. UnrepentantLiberal Aug 2012 #29

None of us have names. Nasty Gash Aug 2012 #32

What is your mode of space travel? UnrepentantLiberal Aug 2012 #34

Thank you for your interest Nasty Gash Aug 2012 #36

This is fascinating and I consider myself lucky to be able to question a real space alien. zappaman Aug 2012 #35

Thank you for your interest Nasty Gash Aug 2012 #37

The burning question that we all need answered........ Amaril Aug 2012 #30

He is not one of us Nasty Gash Aug 2012 #33

Well, I'm glad you're here Viva_La_Revolution Aug 2012 #39

The most important thing for a society to survie is science- snooper2 Aug 2012 #40

Is Elvis really dead? sylvi Aug 2012 #42

No new info here NoMoreWarNow Oct 2012 #44

No new info there, either William Seger Oct 2012 #45

Building 7 1444tx Nov 2012 #46

Pull-it isn't a term used by demolition teams while imploding buildings cpwm17 Nov 2012 #47

WTC7 fell in silence... I saw a video of the collapse at a lecture given by a NIST scientist... reACTIONary Dec 2012 #49

And Mr. Silverstein..... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #50