Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 911: Window of Exposure [View all]AlwaysQuestion
(442 posts)76. "Brilliantly ridiculous notion," eh wot?
Oh, LARED, don't tell me you're still doing duty and flogging the same ol' horse. I used to get so annoyed with you but once I realized what you were up to, I knew that debating 911 with you would be much akin to trying to nail jelly to a wall--one enormous waste of effort.
Still, your stick-to-it-ness must be acknowledged--albeit from my point of you not in the most favorable light. There's much to be said about the theory of randomness but most assuredly that theory cannot in any way be in effect in the case of 911 for any number of reasons most recently put forth by .. - and many, many other knowledgeable contributors preceding him. I'm hoping against hope that logic and the law will eventually prevail oh dreamer that I am.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
I don't expect much outcry when attempts are made to steal this election, either.
dixiegrrrrl
Sep 2012
#5
So, your proof of conspiracy is that Rumsfeld adhered to a course of action that YOU determine
MercutioATC
Sep 2012
#8
But I did "argue against it" and all you could do was reassert the same dubious premise
William Seger
Sep 2012
#19
No, if you're just going to keep repeating the same faulty argument, let's stop
William Seger
Sep 2012
#23
Every single point you raise is speculative, "I think this is what would have happened"
stevenleser
Oct 2012
#52
Not only have I done the homework, I'm former military (US Air Force) I understand this a lot better
stevenleser
Oct 2012
#54