Creative Speculation

Which is it, now:

> A Troll, otoh, would simply call the paper 'idiotic' and be otherwise incapable of addressing any of the details substantively.

or:

> You mean the post where you make a bunch of assertions... With no evidence, no links, and no excerpts to back them up?

If you wanted links and excerpts, then you should have asked for them. Instead, you go with the "troll" bullshit yet again and accuse me of "simply call{ing} the paper 'idiotic'." I was giving you the benefit of a doubt by suggesting that you hadn't read post #16, but now you say you did but decided to ignore it and then lie about its existence?

You're late to the party. We've discussed that paper MANY times here before -- and I suspect you've actually seen some of it, but would likewise prefer to pretend that it didn't exist -- and it's been discussed in extreme detail on the JREF forum, among other places, including criticism from materials science guys. Anyone who has a serious interest in the subject could easily find out why, after three years, the paper has zero chance of ever being taken seriously among real scientists.

So, can you give me one good reason why I should spend time summarizing those criticisms and looking up references that you could look up yourself, after you have shown such blatant intellectual dishonesty?