Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Osama Confession Video [View all]The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)51. Amazing.
You're nothing but a case study in the ignorance of reason, failure of logic, and inability to distinguish fact from opinion.
I just read through a few of those posts, and guess what?
There is STILL nothing demonstrating that their findings were false. No links there either! Wow!
Like here, you just make shit up and apparently rely on your insistance that it's true for people to believe it.
You had nothing then and you have nothing now.
The only thing I can't work out is whether you actually believe in your verisimilitude or you know that you're full of crap.
This is a classic example of how trolls poison dialogue: Throw enough bullshit to obscure the reasoning, wait to be called on it, and then try to claim that the other participant is 'arrogant' or 'un-civil'.
I can't count the number of times I've run into this tactic with climate change deniers. It's identical.
Another tactic you've used here: Claim that the issue 'was already resolved' or 'disproven' "somewhere else" and then throw up links to more chaff.
Where are the ACTUAL refutations of the paper????
As I suspected, you have nothing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So I say 'you have nothing', and ask for the *actual* refutations of the paper....
The Doctor.
Oct 2012
#65
We got here because in another thread I said that there is no hard evidence
The Doctor.
Oct 2012
#18
You seem to be having difficulty with the English Language and very simple concepts.
cpwm17
Oct 2012
#30
So a video of someone bragging about comitting a crime is not hard evidence?
The Doctor.
Oct 2012
#38
Your faulty logic, arrogant assertions, and outright distortions of what's been said in this thread
William Seger
Oct 2012
#49
Oh, so you think maybe bin Laden might have painted the buildings with exploding paint?
William Seger
Oct 2012
#56
Why should I expect that explaining it a fourth time would make a difference?
William Seger
Oct 2012
#44
Yer just about off the deep end here. I don't recall telling Tombs anything in person.
The Doctor.
Oct 2012
#46
Yes, you've convinced me that you'll keep repeating the same nonsense over and over
William Seger
Oct 2012
#59
That's rather authoritarian of you to accept the FBI so righteously, The Doctor.
Bolo Boffin
Oct 2012
#68
So now you believe there is a conspiracy theory that the FBI dismisses hard evidence?
The Doctor.
Nov 2012
#76
If you can't understand the words "hard evidence" when they are put together,
The Doctor.
Nov 2012
#79
I already showed you a link concerning Osama's claims of responsibility for 9-11
cpwm17
Nov 2012
#84