Creative Speculation

OoooooooooooKaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay. I retract my insinuation that you are an apologist for murderers. I have a replacement insinuation, but stating it might push the limits of the forum rules.

As for the apparently endless repetition of your failed argument, did you find that legal definition of "hard evidence" yet? 'Cause it appears that you aren't even trying. And tell me again why Tomb is compelled to accept a video of someone bragging to his buddies as "hard evidence -- or actually, tell me for the first time? Also, you didn't answer to the fact that your conclusions could be wrong even if your faulty premises were correct, because a fake video or fake translation are clearly not the only possible explanations for why an FBI PR guy would say what he did.

> You claim all this evidence exists, yet the FBI did not believe there was enough for a mere indictment.

That's correct, I make that claim despite the fact that one FBI PR guy apparently didn't agree in a casual telephone interview. Such is the nature of opinion, as you so eloquently pointed out yourself.

> Bonus question: Do you believe Humans are responsible for the current global warming?

Yes, I do. Bonus suggestion: Stick to the topic. That irrelevancy and the "troll" bullshit are just making you look even more foolish.