Creative Speculation

The two paragraphs I asked you to reread ARE actual refutations, dude. Understanding what they say would take you a long way to understanding why, after three years, no serious scientists take that ridiculous paper seriously, and why the never will: It's unscientific crap.

Yep, I could certainly provide excerpts from the paper for everything I said about it, but you SAID you already read all of it. If that were true, then the only reason I should need to provide excerpts for what the paper says is your poor reading comprehension. Why should I expect your reading comprehension to improve if I copy pieces of it here, especially when you have already demonstrated so many times in this thread that the written word escapes you?

And why should I expect that effort to have any effect on someone who is not only laughably illogical but who seems to be incapable of arguing honestly? You accused me of "making shit up." That is a lie, and I'm gonna guess that the reason that you won't even ATTEMPT to point to something I made up is that you KNOW it's a lie.

So, here's the deal: Accuse me again of "making shit up" and point to an example based on your vast understanding of the paper and the issues, and I will then show this board which one of us is full of shit.

Your move.