Creative Speculation

Appealing to authority of one FBI Agent's opinion concerning Osama's guilt and one highly disputed paper, that you can't defend, does not equal incredible evidence for controlled demolitions. They don't equal evidence for CD's at all.

We've already covered the "hard evidence" for Osama's guilt issue. You can watch the video and evaluate much of the collaborating evidence the same as your favorite FBI agent.

Science is a process. One paper written by some folks with fancy titles doesn't necessarily equal science. A large percentage of preliminary results from initial scientific studies are not accurate. The initial study must be duplicated or falsified by further studies. That's the only way science can work.

Just about the entire scientific community supports the obvious fact that the towers were brought down by the planes and subsequent fires. Scientists and engineers determined why the towers fell through a diligent scientific process.

You're claiming that the towers were taken down by controlled demolitions. The burden of proof is on you. But your hurdle is infinitely high, since we already know who took the towers down and why they collapsed.