Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: What is the thing about 911 being a inside job that is the hardest to explain away? [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Some say it was Israeli agents. Other say it was Bush/Cheney on a nationalist bent. Others say it was a shadowy cabal seeking global domination.
Some say it was a missile. Others say it was a suitcase nuke. Still others claim demolitions from inside the building. Others claim it was some sort of sci-fi weapon. Others say it was terrorists but Bush allowed the attack to happen.
Meanwhile, Obama has become president and is in charge of the very people who would have had to carry out the orders. That makes Obama either a total buffoom who doesn't kow what goes on in his own government or he's a willing accomplice and we're total buffoons for voting him in. Although 4 years ago the CTers would have sworn up and down that Bush/Cheney were going to declare martial law before they ever allowed an outsider to ruin their scheme.
All this swirls around and around. For a thing to be so "scientifically" provable that people should throw-away what was plainly seen by millions the CTers seem to have a hard time settling on any one "scientifically" provable explanation. The only thing they can agree on is they're angry at the US -- but then again, so was Tim McVeigh.