Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Dallas Morning News: Gary Mack and the evolution of a JFK conspiracy theorist [View all]MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)It's either has to be "this" or "that"... If it isn't a lone gunman, then it must be a second shooter's egress.
Has anyone here even read or listened to anything from Jim Garrison's work on to the present where evidence was the subject? Had you done so or listened to more recent authors, you'd be presented with evidence that's existed for years. There were a lot of questions to suggest who went where, if indeed there were shooters beyond the grassy knoll, fence and storm water sewer area. Much of what the Shaw trial explained about shooters and the House Select Committee on Assassination American REcords Review Board.
Instead of talking about what you MAY have read such as getting documents that were fundamental to tracking down all the evidence of the case, you and others take any and all efforts to discredit.
A whole lot of people did the same to discredit Jim Garrison him, kill off and scare off witnesses and infiltration and use of FBI and CIA, and other agencies to get into media and slant stories and discredit Garrison, his staff, witnesses to the assassination...
Feel free to distract. For all others, stop by and listen to another archived version of this evening's internet radio show - Black Op Radio, another reason to discredit all the disinformation you and others keep spinning.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)