Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
56. You apparently make an argument...
Sun Mar 17, 2013, 09:56 AM
Mar 2013

... which is based on ..."inaccurate, since the visit could have happened on the evening before Oswald left..." Then, when putting forth your theory to counter why someone couldn't possibly be setting up Oswald, you add another layer of your "theory" to cover any evidence that, "If it really was Oswald that visited Odio... it implies absolutely nothing..." WTF? Nice way to have a self-fulfilled prophecy, Billy.

This is why I no longer believe that you and some other ridiculous spinners on this forum don't read the material they cry about. Every stupid and silly remark shows over and over the spin, based on a few authors, so your talking points are not well referenced. They never are. You endeavor to wherever you can, to repeat (whether it's a video about other things you detest, or the JFK, which you REALLY detest), by reacting to "spooky one-note sound tracks" as you spin. .. It really takes away from any question being put forth.

When you decide to read (a skill requiring devotion to that attention span), you might invest in reading the second and third generation of researchers, who are well based - not only in reading interviews and the Warren Commission, but sworn testimony of the early investigative reporting and follow through, all well referenced. From THAT reading, you will note that Sylvia Odio was one of the BEST and most important witnesses...


She said that two Cubans came to her house in late September of 1963 with a Caucasian man they called Leon Oswald. In fact, today's evidence is pretty decisive that there was a Leon Oswald in New Orleans around this time. Richard Case Nagell also said he knew a Leon Oswald in that summer of 1963. Nagell said that this Leon Oswald was meant as a Second Oswald and was working with the anti-Castro Cubans, he was not at all pro-Castro. Raymond Broshears, a friend of David Ferrie's also spoke about a Leon Oswald. He described him as resembling Oswald. Michael Kurtz interviewed rightwing witness in Baton Rouge who recalled meeting an Oswald who was introduced to them as Leon Oswald in July and August of 1963. This happened more than once, and on his last visit to the area, Leon Oswald was accompanied by two Latins. David F Lewis, who once worked for Banister, said that he was introduced to a man named Leon Oswald by Sergio Arcacha Smith's right hand man Carols Quiroga at Mancuso's REstaurant in late 1962.

DiEugenio says it's doubtful that this was the real Lee Harvey Oswald since he was still living in the Dall-Fort Worth area at the time. All of this testimony strongly suggests that there actually was a Leon Oswald who resembled Oswald.

Without having to go out and buy you the damned book, Billy, why don't you just READ about the significance of The Odio episode? The absolute best investigative reference into her significance, including what the Commission decided NOT to use can be found in DiEugenio's "Destiny Betrayed" (I have 2nd edition, paper bound, so it won't break your bank), should you actually decide to read what you cry foul over.

Meanwhile, so nice of you to jump in and cover other's posts here. I'm afraid that's all I can offer the light weights here. For everything else, there's reading comprehension and not being a goof ball about this.

Hey, I'm sure glad you're stuck on these video's.... cause they'll be at least 50 of them leading up to the 50th anniversary of the worst conspiracy this country's faced. The sooner we realize this, the better. So glad you're part of it, even though your part is a petty annoyance without credible reading comprehension.

Have a nice day!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank you zappaman Mar 2013 #1
I have searched for these "conspiracy cranks " Frosty1 Mar 2013 #2
The first time I ever visited the 6th Floor Museum.. MicaelS Mar 2013 #3
The first time I visited the 6th floor museum... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #4
Again with the "ear witness" stuff William Seger Mar 2013 #5
Couple of things, Bill... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #6
Looks more like a couple of nothings, Mom William Seger Mar 2013 #7
Talk about wasting you keyboard skills... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #8
"Point me to any one of those videos..." William Seger Mar 2013 #9
Couldn't find one, huh? William Seger Mar 2013 #12
Please don't cry, Bill MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #14
No problem. William Seger Mar 2013 #18
You understand you are kicking my post about a reformed conspiracy theorist? Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #21
Whatever exposes the truth... matters not BB MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #22
Kick! n/t zappaman Mar 2013 #26
There's a PARKING LOT BEHIND THAT FENCE. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #10
Good point William Seger Mar 2013 #11
Not to mention all those people you can see looking back at the TSBD in the films used here Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #13
Enter mcadams... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #16
It's got nothing to do with McAdams William Seger Mar 2013 #17
HA! MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #15
Nah, they'd naturally decide to do a suicide rush on the shooter William Seger Mar 2013 #19
OK, fine! All those folks are bugging up there to catch them a second shooter. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #20
"That would fit the facts, woodunit? MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #23
Maybe the second shooter got beamed up, then? Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #24
Maybe you could continue to give credence to your belief... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #27
Yes, I agree that a second shooter up on the grassy knoll is silly and hilarious Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #30
You would... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #32
Feel free to explain how the second shooter got away any time now. n/t Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #33
That's the argument of the absolute... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #34
If there was a second shooter, he got away. How? Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #35
I'll bet a lot of people got away... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #36
You can't answer because there is no answer that doesn't expose you to ridicule. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #37
I can only answer real questions... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #39
How did the second shooter escape? That's a real question. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #40
Episode Six: "Jim DiEugenio discusses a strange visit..." William Seger Mar 2013 #54
You apparently make an argument... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #56
"All of this testimony strongly suggests..." William Seger Mar 2013 #57
reply to #54 arguille Mar 2013 #74
"represents quite a bit more than the 'nothing' you think it does" William Seger Mar 2013 #76
I'll take that bet. zappaman Mar 2013 #38
I was fortunate to visit it once and it immediately struck me that Oswald was a dumbass... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #25
Heck, the photo supports what you said, if nothing else. MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #28
No, the "real perps" were the dumb asses William Seger Mar 2013 #29
No, actually, they were the smart ones....Oswald DID get blamed for something he was perhaps only... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #42
You're just assuming the consequent. William Seger Mar 2013 #43
Ah, I shouldn't believe my lying eyes... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #46
Well, first, I'd suggest actually USING your eyes William Seger Mar 2013 #52
reply to #52 arguille Mar 2013 #73
Uh.... huh? William Seger Mar 2013 #75
And if he'd tried to shoot then, everyone would have seen him do it. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #31
I'm sorry but that isn't even remotely logical... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #41
Sweet Jesus. At the very least, the Secret Service would have. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #44
"At the very least, the Secret Service would have." zappaman Mar 2013 #45
He ran because he knew he was being set up... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #47
He ran because he had just assassinated the President of the United States... Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #48
...except he had done no such thing.. truebrit71 Mar 2013 #49
...except he had... Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #50
That's difficult to understand because it doesn't make any sense William Seger Mar 2013 #53
According to the OP, Gary Mack "now believes Oswald was the only gunman that day." AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #51
Yes, that is correct. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #55
Re-read what was posted at #51, not your interpretation of the story referred to in the OP. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #58
I'm sorry, but it's you that has the problem with reading comprehension. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #59
No. Your problem is that (a) you came up with a who-gives-a-shit story, (b) you interpreted what AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #60
Thank you for your concern. n/t Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #61
That's what you can expect, AM... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #62
Have we a bet yet? zappaman Mar 2013 #64
What does that tell me? In my experience, liberals are open minded, are willing to consider facts, AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #65
To ignore a mockingbird... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #66
Is this yet one more snide DU-rule-skating insinuation that I am not a liberal and in league with Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #67
+1 zappaman Mar 2013 #68
Gary Mack... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #63
"Even if the statement in the OP were true..." William Seger Mar 2013 #69
It is enough that you misrepresent what I've said. You've changed the subject. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #70
Well, that particular comment was really addressed to... William Seger Mar 2013 #71
Oh, by the way, I see now that you are correct William Seger Mar 2013 #72
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Dallas Morning News: Gary...»Reply #56