Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Bugliosi: 53 Reasons It Was Lee Harvey Oswald [View all]OrwellwasRight
(5,210 posts)There are too many problems with the autopsy:
-missing time when the body should have been at the autopsy but wasn't
-burned notes
-photos that have been kept classified
-testimony of witnesses from Parkland who dispute the autopsy report's description of the wounds
etc.
Besides, forensic experts not present at autopsies (they are called defense witnesses) testify in court all the time. They are considered credible because of their expertise, and they can apply their expertise to challenge the conclusions of others, based on their own analysis of the evidence and conclusions the prosecution draws therefrom.
So "being present" is not a requirement, and it's a straw man when your expert wasn't there either.
This tiresome. Good day, sir.