Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Bugliosi: 53 Reasons It Was Lee Harvey Oswald [View all]OrwellwasRight
(5,212 posts)Fact: I watched a bit of it.
Fact: I quoted from it about shots from the overpass.
Fact: You didn't like the quote I chose.
Fact: You quibble about south overpass versus north overpass on the basis that your video is credible and the book I cited isn't.
And the video is credible why exactly? I'm not sure. I don't particularly look to A&E for my source of science.
But it appears you want me to say I mixed up the south and the north from the video. Then by all means, I mixed them up. I hope that makes you happy, and helps you decide you can leave this conversation be. I sure doesn't hurt me to say it.
I guess it is a big deal for you because you want the only possible shot to be from the School Book Depository because you believe the only possible shooter was Lee Harvey Oswald. That's awesome that you believe that, and I fully support your right to believe it. I, however, don't.
What is also a fact is that I have told you I don't want to continue this conversation.
What is also a fact is that I didn't tell you how to respond. If I were to tell you how to respond, I would say "Hey, why don't you type back "We'll never agree, and we should end the conversation. This is boring and pointless." That's what I'd tell you to say.
But instead I will continue to say it: We'll never agree, and we should end the conversation. This is boring and pointless.