Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Bugliosi: 53 Reasons It Was Lee Harvey Oswald [View all]Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)Fact: Trying to get someone who calls himself or herself OrwellwasRight to admit that they have materially misrepresented reality hits my addiction's sweet spot.
Fact: Watching someone called OrwellwasRight continue a conversation they claim they do not want to continue ALSO hits my addiction's sweet spot.
Fact: There is no shot from the only area Feister says the shot came from.
That is something the video establishes beyond any doubt. They brought an exact replica of the presidential limo to Dealey Plaza. They placed actors of the right size in that limo and put "JFK" over the exact spot on which the president was shot. In the area where Feister claims the shot came from, the sniper expert says there is no shot. Not the first location and not the south overpass location (which is actually just out of the area she marks out). JFK would have been blocked from a sniper in these locations by parts of the limo itself, parts that sustained no damage whatsoever.
It is physically impossible, the evidence being as it is, for a sniper on the south side of Dealey Plaza to have shot the president. This is not something I want to believe. This is a simple fact, easily verified by anyone who can watch the video.
But please do continue to replace these facts with your preferred beliefs and then tell me that's what I'm doing. Because as I said before, OrwellwasRight, I'm an irony junkie.