Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Here's a correction OP for 50 Reasons, 50 Years OP [View all]arguille
(60 posts)To engage in lectures over "speculative guesswork" and then present the single bullet theory as a "credible explanation" is a remarkable feat of cognitive dissonance, if nothing else. And it is nothing else.
Only died-in-the-wool Warren Commission supporters could offer a comparison diagram featuring a man lying on his back head slightly raised, set against a man placed on his side held by doctors - and expect the geometric lines to match anything but BS. Not to mention the head is larger in one photograph than the other. And the supposed path of the bullet in the diagram bears no relation to the downward track measured by the Bethesda doctors as they noted a back wound which extended less than a finger-length into the body. But pay that no mind, because Seger has discovered the same "clear, logical connection" that his predecessors have earlier inferred. Of course, if the first back wound is actually too low to begin with to create this magical logical connection
well, here's some deceptive diagrams to look at while he gets the bridge ready for the big sale.
"if Oswald went down the stairs even as little a 15 seconds before Adams and Styles, then they would have missed him
"
Except, Sherlock, it has been established the TSBD staircase was creaky and noisy and they would have HEARD him. If you want to add more seconds to that, then Roy Truly would have heard them. David Belin worked his way through all of these schemes before deciding to say she was off by 5 minutes. By the way, Miss Garner seeing the Truly and Baker "right after" is your inference. The Stroud memo says: "after Miss Adams went downstairs she (Miss Garner) saw Mr Truly and the policeman come up." The Warren Commission instead went with a story which is wildly different, and so instead of attempting to reconcile the differences as an honest inquiry would do, they hid this information from the public.
I will let the remainder of your post - which consists of logical contortions and twisted reasoning necessitated by stubborn denial - stand without comment as a monument to your own foolishness.