Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William Seger

(11,294 posts)
1. "New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile"
Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:04 PM
Jul 2013

Or so says Kevin Barrett:

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: "The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals."


Barrett didn't include a link to the study, for reasons that should be obvious if you compare the actual study to his gross distortions of it: The authors of the study certainly didn't make those absurdly illogical claims. But Barrett lives in a fantasy world where Muslims weren't responsible for 9/11 -- the Jews did it. And of course, Barrett forces himself to overlook the simple and obvious reason why such delusional and disingenuous terrorist apologists who call themselves "truthers" draw such hostility.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»“What about building 7?” ...»Reply #1