Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Debunked: "Molten Metal" Explained [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)If you want to see that sort of problem, next time a major storm hits Seattle, like the Inaugural Day Storm, do what I do. Go down to alki beach. Stand with your back to the ocean, and watch the transformers blow up all over Seattle.
It's quite the show.
Not even 7 came down in its own footprint. If that was a CD, the owners of the surrounding buildings would have maxxed out their insurance in a heartbeat. NONE of the towers came down symmetrically. All you have to do is a look at a top-down photo of the wreckage to see the bias of the towers in their fall.
I'm curious by what method you think each floor was 'exploded'? No thermite is visible from the outside. Not sure if you've ever seen thermite or thermate in action, but it's pretty obvious because it burns with all the appearance of an arc welder. So that rules out that. What explosive do they hypothetically use to pulverize concrete into 100 micron dust, FLOOR BY FLOOR, in a steady roar, with no bangs? Recall, there is video not only from the outside, but the INSIDE of the towers as the collapse started. It is a roar. The kind of roar consistent with a progressive collapse, not a series of bangs. (Doubly impressive since this alleged demo went off without a hitch, where real life, actual demolitions do sometimes have hilarious failures.)
In towers 1 and 2, I see floors smashed to dust. The two towers had, respective of the impact points, a WWI top-tier battleship, and the other, the equivalent mass of WWII's Yamoto, sitting on top of the impact points. The supports, which were visibly pulled inward prior to the collapse, snap, and the mass above comes slamming down, dropping 20 feet unopposed.
Possibly the largest wrecking ball humanity has ever unleashed.