Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Free Fall 7/18/13: Dr. deHaven-Smith and "conspiracy theory" [View all]joeglow3
(6,228 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
At Fri Nov 1, 2013, 10:41 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1135&pid=6146
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Rude and needlessly insulting . I understand the poster is new but needs to understand they can engage without insulting.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Nov 1, 2013, 10:50 AM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: An unnecessary comment, but not "over-the-top." Besides, I would leave it so others can see it. Nothing screams "I lost this debate" more than someone resorting to these types of comments.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: It was an interesting thread till the personal attack.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: This whole thread is silly. I'm not going to favor one side or another with a hide. My advice: just walk away!
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.