Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Free Fall 7/18/13: Dr. deHaven-Smith and "conspiracy theory" [View all]Ace Acme
(1,464 posts)Pray tell, how can NIST say "the propagation of the collapse was readily explained" when they claim they did not analyze the collapses? They even admitted that they are "unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse".
I never said anything about every detail about every last piece of steel. You sound like an embezzler explaining that he can't account for the use of every 3X5 card and every post-it note. Thanks for being so transparent.
The collapse of the core was not explained at all, let alone readily explained. Pray tell, how was the loss of structural integrity inflicted without energy inputs demonstrated by slowing the collapse down? Ever hear of the law of conservation of energy?
Shyam Sunder told NOVA that the collapses took 9 seconds and 11 seconds. That's freefall.